![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 20, 11:09*am, Steve Koerner wrote:
It's a no-brainer. *Everyone who flies gliders with other gliders needs to get a PowerFlarm. * I, for one, don't think it is that simple. I agree that FLARM is the best available technology for glider on glider collision avoidance. That part is the no brainer. The situation as I understand it is that one manufacturer of devices that uses FLARM technology has expressed an intention to launch a product (PowerFLARM) in USA. If this produduct is FLARM compatible it must mean that the company holding the rights to the FLARM technology has authorized the use of it in USA. That is something that they have, in the past, prohibited. PowerFLARM includes features that are not included by other manufacturers of equipment using FLARM technology. There is no indication in the specifications, or elsewhere on their website, how these additional features will be integrated with the well proven FLARM functionality. If the holder of the rights to the FLARM technology has authorized its use in USA what is to stop other companies launching a FLARM product to the US market. Perhaps such a product would not have the additional features of the Power FLARM unit but would support only the basic FLARM functionality that has a proven track record. Perhaps that device, or family of devices, would be far less expensive than PowerFLARM. Perhaps these devices already exist and just need a firmware change to assign the correct frequencies for use in USA. The SSA rules committee needs to immediately adopt a mandate for PowerFlarm in 2011 sanctioned contests No rule should require the use of a particular manufacturer's product. The rule that should be considered is one that requires the use of a FLARM compatible device. so that the Flarm folks understand their mission and can get production ramped accordingly. Who are the FLARM folks that you refer to? In an earlier post you said "Andy -- have some faith. The Flarm designers are glider pilots and have been at this for years. The track record is that of remarkable success". Do you mean the manufacturer of PowerFLARM, or perhaps the holder of the FLARM rights. To the best of my knowledge these are not the same company. (Maybe someone that knows the relationship between the various companies and the people involved could comment) Andy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Trig TT21 transponder draws only 125 mA! | Steve Koerner | Soaring | 5 | March 15th 10 09:59 PM |
TRIG TT21 Transponders | Tim Mara[_2_] | Soaring | 12 | September 26th 09 02:01 AM |
Trig TT21 Transponder receives FAA TSO approval | Paul Remde | Soaring | 12 | September 19th 09 02:47 PM |
Trig TT21 in Experimental Aircraft | Paul Remde | Soaring | 5 | July 5th 09 03:15 AM |
Trig TT21 Transponder Thoughts? | jcarlyle | Soaring | 16 | June 23rd 09 04:38 PM |