![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 18:22:49 -0700 (PDT), Eunometic
wrote: On Sep 3, 10:48*am, John wrote: On Sep 2, 10:08*am, Eunometic wrote: Several aircraft have been built with both a pull (or tractor) propeller and a push (or rear) propeller aligned with each other. Supposedly the arrangment is inefficient, yet the some of the Dornier aircraft were record breakers. Given that some aircraft were ruined or delayed by the problem of combining gearboxes (He 177, Northrop XB-35 and if it ever came to it the B-29 with its backup V-3420) * it looks like an attractive proposition. What's going on here? List of such aircraft: Cessna 337 Skymaster Rutan Model 76 Vogager Adam A500 Dornier Wal Dornier Do X Dornier Do 18 Seaplane, the German PPY Catalina. Dornier Do 26K Seaplane, possibly the longer ranged seaplane ever built. Dornier Do 335 Pfeil (arrow) *perhaps one of the fastest piston engined aircraft ever built. Dornier Seawings Seastar, modern Seaplane of composites. Savoia-Marchetti S.55 LeO H-242 I don't know about the others but my understanding is that the Skymaster was an attempt to design a twin engined plane that would have the same overall dimensions as a single engine aircraft and be safer to fly since it would eliminate asymetric thrust during engine failure. *The ironic thing is that the Skymaster safety record is no better than a conventional twin.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Possibly psychological "a single engined failure isn't dangerous so I won't maintain the aircraft factor" and ofcourse perhaps engine failure isn't the major cause of light plane crashes. A single engined turbo prop is safer than a twin engine piston and possibly even safer than a twin turbo since the pilots inabiility to handle asymetrical thrust may be worse than his abillity to handle a glide/crash landing. Famously some singles have crashed and smashed through brick walls and the pilot walked free unscathed, the engine acting as a battering ram and protection. That a single piston is safer than a twin is a classic of probability theory, taugh in junior high around here (not back in the day though). Peter Skelton |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Just pull the little red handle! | JJ Sinclair | Soaring | 65 | September 5th 10 11:57 AM |
Propeller or jet to push an in-line skater? | John Doe[_4_] | Home Built | 33 | July 28th 10 09:28 PM |
PUSH START | stanley adelson | Aviation Photos | 0 | July 15th 08 01:16 AM |
Question about center-line push-pull engine configuration | Shin Gou | Home Built | 4 | June 7th 04 05:57 PM |
Nasal cannula, flowmeter combinations. | Lord Struthers | Soaring | 0 | May 5th 04 05:04 PM |