![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 7, 11:02*pm, Frank wrote:
On Sep 7, 10:29*pm, Andy wrote: On Sep 7, 5:50*pm, "John Godfrey (QT)" wrote: For any flight for which you must turn in a log (i.e. any launch taken from the contest site after grid time and before the day is canceled) you may not enter closed airspace. *You can violate closed airspace and incur the penalty whether you start or not and whether the day is canceled or not. No doubt that this is what SSA rules require but the rules really need a review and I'd suggest bringing the airspace violation rules in line with FAI. In this case the FAI rules would have scored 66 (the OP) to the point of furthest progress and there would have been no penalty. The stupidity of the situation is that 66 would be 100 points better off if he had a logger failure than if he announced his intention to abandon the task, made a completely legal class C overflight, *and then turned in his log. I hope 66 was not depending on the prize money to buy groceries this week. Andy (the scorer in this instance) Even more stupidly, if a contestant turns in a log with an inadvertent airspace violation, and elects to withdraw his flight log for the day, he/she STILL gets a zero for the day plus a 100 pt penalty the next day. *How bizarre is that?! *The rule that says a contestant must be offered the opportunity to withdraw his/her flight log was intended to avoid having a record of an airspace violation hanging around where someone from our friendly government might see it (can you say "airline pilot career-ending"?). *However, with the present rule interpretation, a zero on day X combined with a 100pt penalty on day X +1 is no less incriminating than the original flight log, especially when the score becomes 'official'. Ya gotta love the guys who think these things up - going one way and then the other on the same issue. *We now have the best scoring system in the world. *It is so good that you have to consult with two lawyers, three accountants, and a convicted felon (only the felon really understands the system) before turning in the day's flight log TA- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - It is not complicated. Stay out of forbidden airspace- don't get penalty. The contest board, and by extension the rules committee, has a clear directive from the SSA board to have a zero tolerance policy with respect top airspace violations. The rules reflect this directive. If you can make a case for being lenient on violations, please try to do so. The decision not to permit overflight is based primarily on 2 considerations: 1) Transponders are required for overflight of some of these pieces of airspace. To not be at a competitive disadvantage, pilots would have to add another expensive piece of equipment(understood that some folks would think this is a good idea) which can have an adverse affect on participation. Don't make the mistake of making the case that they are not required. The order of precidence in the FAR's, which was carefully parsed, will show otherwise. 2)) There is no assurance that the pilot can positively stay out of the airspace as he may descend into it. 40 guys all asking for OK to fly through Class C would result in a huge mess. "Simple" solution- stay out. As to withdrawal of log- or non submission. Your violation is between you and the FAA and the contest operation etc. intends to stay out of that. The policies here are, in part, the result of one of the most difficult exchanges between the contest committee and the BOD and will not be subject to change. FWIW UH SSA Competition Rules Subcomittee Chair |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fed: Planes flying in "commercial" airspace must get GPS | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 66 | June 4th 10 12:54 PM |
(USA) US/Mexico "airspace" (boundary) files available | Tuno | Soaring | 4 | March 27th 10 07:17 PM |
On Sharing airspace with "non-rated UAV "pilots" | vaughn | Piloting | 15 | March 15th 09 04:08 PM |
"Fly Baby, you violated Class B Airspace" | Ron Wanttaja | Piloting | 27 | September 5th 07 08:30 PM |
Aviation Conspiracy: Connecticut To Get "Creamed" By Airspace Redesign Change? | Free Speaker | General Aviation | 0 | August 8th 06 02:42 PM |