A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Jim Pennino or...Jim Pinheado?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old September 16th 10, 05:11 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 815
Default Jim Pennino or...Jim Pinheado?

On Sep 16, 11:24*am, wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Sep 15, 8:04*pm, wrote:


You said you were going to buy a LSA, not build one, which means the
airworthiness certificate would be invalid.


There are numerous LSA's which you can buy near completion,
then finish them, becoming the builder on record, and still meet
the 50-50 rule.


It is called the 51% rule, not the 50-50 rule.


Technicality.

Last I looked there are no kit LSA's which meet the 51% rule for the
simple reason that the 51% rule does not apply to kit built LSA's.


Yes, I have personal knowledge of this.

Actually what came to mind is the scenerio where companies like
Arion and some other's have Builder Assist. I have encountered
unfinished projects for sale.

The RV-12 may, but it isn't available yet so that is unknown.

And to be the builder and meet the 51% rule, you have to do 51% of the
work, not buy something 98% complete and just do the last 2%.


That isn't what Nick Otterback, Arion's product development manager
told me when I asked him in person. The final authority would be the
FAA, but thus far I have been told different.

If you build one and invalidate it as a LSA, now you have to go to the
FAA and somehow get the thing cerificated as an exprimental after the
fact. *Good luck on that.


What's an exprimental? *New category?


Experimental is what most people call the airplanes that the FAA calls
amateur built which get as label saying "experimental" on them.


Grin, I was just messing with you. Your spelling and grammar
are consistently off, i.e., you'd properly say "an" LSA, not "a" LSA.
I probably know every experimental plane there is. You wrote...
"exprimental", and "cerificated". That's baby gibberish.

If you actually knew anything about aviation you would know that.


I could easily say, "if you weren't a pin-head my spelling correction
wouldn't have escaped you", but you've been respectful lately and
deserve the same. A little humor is like a little salt. Adds flavor.

Jim logajan posts:
2) Also, for the record, the FAA speed requirement for LSA has some
important qualifiers that allow LSA airplanes to legally travel faster
than
120 kts.


No one but you ever said anything about them not being able to.


No. You said it wasn't allowed.


No, I said you are not allowed to modify the airplane in such a way that
the max cruise speed at sea level is greater than 120 kts.


While that is correct, you're official position now has been modified
to be so. No matter. Let's move on.

Actually, you are not allowed to modify anything on a LSA.


The manufacturer will dictate that. (remember..."an" LSA).
A further examination of allowances is worthwhile. Many flight
schools that only offer PP certification are approaching
illiteracy on this subject.

---

Mark

--
Jim Pennino



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.