![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 19, 11:48*pm, Jim Logajan wrote:
While I do not have a lot of time to spare for it, I would be willing to perform the "dirty work" necessary toward creation of a moderated version of this newsgroup. It would co-exist with this unmoderated one. But I need to know if there is a large enough potential audience of users for such a group. So if you would be willing to carry on conversations on such a group (keeping in mind that posts would be delayed) please post a reply to this message so stating your willingness. I'm sorry that I cannot say yet who might moderate, other than to point out that the technical capability exists to support multiple moderators such that the most lenient judgement would prevail. If you must, assume the worst (that I am the sole moderator.) Since this newsgroup would continue to exist, and because competing web forums already exist, there does not seem anything of interest that could be said by those who might oppose creation of such a group. The RFD would simply state that posts will be approved so long as they are reasonably on-topic and non-inflammatory in the subjective judgement of the moderators. Worst case is that posters can always return to this non- moderated group in the event their posts are rejected or they feel the moderators have become too anal or otherwise lost their minds. It's a totally reasonable idea Jim, and for the little I remain involved with Usenet, I would naturally support your effort. The problem as I see it anyway, is the usual Usenet issue; that being most Usenet users don't seem to mind the trolling and obvious posting by the same individuals using different posting personae so they can argue with themselves believing or not caring that anyone with a room temperature IQ knows they are the same people :-) Personally, my guess is that the result of such an effort will be a modicum of people for such a forum and a majority content to leave things the way they are and simply avoiding the idiots and morons the Usenet venue seems to attract. You will notice that the exact reason you are suggesting a moderated group is in play here now and has been for some time. :-))))))))))))))))) Anyway, as I said, it's a reasonable idea and a shame it probably won't get the support you need to make it work. I could be wrong, but my experience tells me I'm guessing pretty close to right on this.....................but the best of luck with it and I hope you manage to get something going, as what's happened here is a real shame. Dudley |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RFD: remove rec.aviation.announce moderated | Jim Riley | Home Built | 0 | February 27th 07 05:28 AM |
RFD: remove rec.aviation.announce moderated | Jim Riley | Aerobatics | 0 | February 27th 07 05:28 AM |
RFD: remove rec.aviation.answers moderated | Jim Riley | Piloting | 0 | February 27th 07 05:24 AM |
RFD: remove rec.aviation.questions moderated | Jim Riley | Owning | 0 | February 27th 07 05:18 AM |
RFD: remove rec.aviation.announce moderated | Jim Riley | General Aviation | 0 | February 26th 07 09:25 PM |