![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:05:59 -0700, Tankfixer
wrote: In article , says... In message , Dave Kearton writes IMHO Lt Osborn made all the right decisions under very trying circumstances. He kept the plane aloft, long enough for all the sensitive gear to be destroyed, he KEPT HIS CREW ALIVE and what was left of the plane was flown back to the US after the Chinese were done with it. If you think worst-case, ditching or baling out offers the Chinese a nasty option. "We picked up nine of the crew, here they are. Mission Supervisor Snuffy, who knows all about what the aircraft can do and what its mission was? No, haven't found a trace of him, but we're still searching..." And who's to know different? Once the crew lose sight of each other, there's no way to know whether Supervisor Snuffy died during the bailout, drowned in the ocean, is on a slow fishing boat with no comms on his way to port, or is being forcibly persuaded to be detailed and explicit about EP-3 capabilities in a Beijing basement. Once the hard discs, memory cards, crypto modules, whatever have been dealt with, the EP-3 is an elderly turboprop with a lot of radio receivers feeding to dead systems. Not a lot of genuine intel value the it's an ELINT platform, gee whiz, who knew? The crew are the real prize which could compromise the capability: keeping them together, alive, and getting them all home protects the most important asset. Who cares what the Chinese would see on the plane, they would get that hardware via other means anyway. A cynical part of me wonders how much of the hardware is "Made in China" anyway. Radio receivers aren't exactly new or secret, it's what they feed, what you can achieve with them and what you were sent to get that matter. I always wondered why once they had landed and all that a rather nasty fire didn't break out onboard... Maybe they discovered that destruct packages were more trouble than they were worth. After they brought in the F-4Ds at Ubon in May 1967 we had problems with the destruct packages in the APS-107 Omni Analyzer in one of the forward missile wells going off on the ground. Interesting watching the reaction of people seeing smoke come out of the forward bottom part of the aircraft. If I remember right they were all out within a month... They had a little box called the destruct power supply that went along with the destruct package. We had them all sitting on a shelf awaiting instruction on what to do with them. The canon plugs were oddball so we couldn't get a tight fitting cap. Maintenance supervisor came in one day and reached for an uncovered plug, the cap had fallen off, and said you should have a cap on this. He must have touched the plug and bam he was flying out the door of the little storage room. Impressive. They actually store power as advertised. He was not amused! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PanAm flt943 ditching | Private | Piloting | 0 | February 18th 09 06:26 AM |
Information on Ditching | Dylan Smith | Piloting | 2 | May 5th 05 02:19 AM |
Ditching at Sea | Mike Keown | Naval Aviation | 5 | November 17th 03 09:58 PM |
Ditching Gear Down | Dave Kearton | Military Aviation | 18 | October 7th 03 10:27 PM |
Ditching Gear Down | Mike Keown | Naval Aviation | 6 | October 6th 03 04:39 PM |