![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 7, 12:14*pm, Darryl Ramm wrote:
Bzzzttt I've got to shoot myself here for getting missing the critical regulation.... I hope you are healing but the abuse may not have been justified. The full text of 14 CFR 91.217 is as follows: "§ 91.217 Data correspondence between automatically reported pressure altitude data and the pilot's altitude reference. (a) No person may operate any automatic pressure altitude reporting equipment associated with a radar beacon transponder— (1) When deactivation of that equipment is directed by ATC; (2) Unless, as installed, that equipment was tested and calibrated to transmit altitude data corresponding within 125 feet (on a 95 percent probability basis) of the indicated or calibrated datum of the altimeter normally used to maintain flight altitude, with that altimeter referenced to 29.92 inches of mercury for altitudes from sea level to the maximum operating altitude of the aircraft; or (3) Unless the altimeters and digitizers in that equipment meet the standards of TSO-C10b and TSO-C88, respectively. (b) No person may operate any automatic pressure altitude reporting equipment associated with a radar beacon transponder or with ADS–B Out equipment unless the pressure altitude reported for ADS–B Out and Mode C/S is derived from the same source for aircraft equipped with both a transponder and ADS–B Out." Note that (a)( 3) is "or-ed" with condition (a)(2). Also note that for a glider no altimeter is used to maintain flight altitude since maintaining flight altitude is not a requirement for gliders. I would conclude that 91.217 imposes no requirement for the altimeter to be TSO C10b compliant. If the OP can't argue that the altimeter is not used to maintain flight altitude then a correspondence check with a non TSO certified altimeter will meet the requirement of 14 CR 91.217 (a)(2). The correspondence check only needs to be done to the "maximum operating altitude of the aircraft" which may be defined for the OP's motor glider but isn't for any unpowered glider. I would further argue that, if there is no requirement to maintain flight altitude, then the altimeter is not part of the automatic pressure altitude reporting equipment. If this is accepted then the only requirement left from 14 CFR 91.217 is that the encoder is TSO C88b compliant. That's a no brainer since they all are. It's much easier to install the equipment yourself than argue the regulations with someone you pay to do the work for you! Andy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB: used 57mm Altimeter OR swap for 80mm Altimeter | joesimmers | Soaring | 0 | November 3rd 09 11:59 AM |
Looking for TSO Altimeter | Rob Turk | Home Built | 0 | June 9th 07 03:52 PM |
Altimeter off | kevmor | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | March 26th 07 12:11 PM |
encoding altimeter | mcfrog | Owning | 3 | May 30th 04 07:39 PM |
Altimeter experience | HankC | Piloting | 2 | July 25th 03 09:43 PM |