![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 10, 4:16*am, bildan wrote:
On Jan 9, 8:03*pm, John Cochrane wrote: There is one untried principle so far. A little vane on a trailing bomb could measure angle of descent. All it needs is accurate measurement of heading relative to straight down. Angle of descent is unaffected by smoothly rising or sinking air. Has anyone tried this? John Cochrane John, it's been seriously discussed several times - once in the McCready/Carmichael group I mentioned before. *L/D is indeed the angle between a horizontal plane and the free air flow. *However, for 40:1 it's around one degree which is a very small angle for experimental measurement. *A long carbon fiber nose boom with a pitch vane could do pretty well with the free air flow part. *The other part requires a very good "stable table" inertial guidance system to provide a perfect horizontal plane. *There's been a lag between the technology to measure L/D this way and the ever increasing L/D to be measured. Today it could probably measure 40:1 pretty well but anything more than that would be lost in the 'noise'. *There are cheaper ways to measure less than 40:1 L/D's. Going back to the speed course idea. *There are huge basins in the western US where pools of cold air collect in winter. *These pools of heavy, cold air form under an intense inversion several thousand feet thick which isolate them from air motions above it. *These cold air pools appear to be utterly free of all air motion. *There are usually perfectly flat dry lakes in the center of these basins where a glider could land. Laying out a carefully surveyed speed course where a glider could enter the course at near redline speed and coast along well above ground effect slowly losing speed in perfectly level flight wouldn't be that hard. *A recording laser range finder altimeter could assure the flight was indeed level. *An auto tow from the dry lake could easily get a glider high enough to run the course. *It would cost so little per flight that scores of runs could be done to reduce 'scatter' of data points. I understand that the Germans now measure the L/D by comparison with a standard calibrated glider in flight, to eliminate the effect of small vertical air currents. Derek C |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Explanation Required: ATA (actual time of arr) and ATD (actual timeof dep) | SVCitian | General Aviation | 2 | September 19th 10 10:27 PM |
W&B-Where do you Measure People Positions | Paul Dow (Remove CAPS in address) | Home Built | 7 | February 1st 10 11:11 AM |
Polar Glider Program | WDM | Soaring | 1 | January 18th 05 01:17 PM |
gps to measure feet? | brucrx | Piloting | 19 | November 13th 04 03:33 AM |
Vandalism, security measure, or something else? | Peter Duniho | Military Aviation | 25 | February 7th 04 05:53 AM |