![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 27, 2:03*am, bumper wrote:
From the NTSB report, "Examination of the tow airplane tail hook assembly revealed that the mounting plate was bent upward and the heads of two connecting bolts were in contact with the base of the rudder. The tail hook was intact and remained attached to the mounting plate. The hook was in the locked position, closed around the tow ring. The release cable remained attached to the hook and was continuous to the cockpit release handle. Functional testing of the tail hook assembly revealed no anomalies, and the assembly functioned appropriately." I'm really surprised at the above part of the NTSB report - - my take is a bit different. I visited the yard where the wreckage was stored, some weeks after the accident, as I happened to be there on other business. I was not allowed to take pictures but did examine the wreckage and in particular, the tow hook assembly. I'm not an expert on aviation wreckage examination, I am trained in auto accident investigation. There were two Schweizer tow hooks mounted to a flat plate, with an additional mounting hole for a third hook, all side-by-side ( I understand multiple tow hooks are sometimes used for banner towing.) The multiple hook mounting plate was attached to the aircraft via what looked to be an alluminum bar, guessing 1/4" thick by 1.5" wide and extending back maybe 8" from the rudder post spring mount . . . you would be correct if you concluded this bar offered minimal resistance to vertical loads without bending. As the NTSB says, the bar was bent upwards and had impacted the lower part of the rudder, deforming bending the bottom bow of the rudder up in the process. Though this jammed the rudder, given the low altitude and nose down attitude pre- crash, the jammed rudder probably was not causal. The upward bend and position of the tow hooks inserted a significant amout of slack in the tow release cable forward of the hook. This slack, along with the new geometry or position of the tow hook with respect to the release cable (i.e. now would be pulling upward on the release toggle instead of forward as necessary to release the hook), looked to me like it would have been impossible to release the tow hook/s from the cockpit, even with no load on the hook. Otherwise the hook appeared to be functional, just not by the cable (note that I did not touch or try to operate the hook by hand - - I was only allowed to look, not touch). From what I saw, I believe the tow hook installation was inadequate and unsafe. If it was causative, it was doubtless not the only cause of this accident, though. It may well be that even if the mount had been designed with the cutomary strength common in tow planes (rather than just being adequate for banner towing) that a kiting glider would still have resulted in the same tragic outcome. I'm posting this as I think the NTSB overlooked and/or glossed over the role the bent tow hook mount may have played, and in doing so missed an opportunity for us to learn from this. As we know even a properly installed upright Schweizer hook can be difficult to release with upward loading. If the mount is inadequate (that aluminum bar comes to mind) and bends up easily, unless the Bowden cable is installed in such a way that the cable stays in line with the hook (i.e. perpendicular to the release toggle) *and, unless there's a way for the release lever or mechanism in the cockpit to take up any extra slack that my be induced by the bent mount, I'd say there's no hope of releasing whatsoever - - even if the tuggie is right on it. bumper Amazing the NTSB overlooked the tow hook installation and completely disregarded the most likely probable cause - that the tug had an unrecoverable upset caused the glider being out of position. This report, and one for a tow fatal at Peoria, AZ, seem to show that NTSB is completely unfamiliar with the tug upset scenario. The combination of a 2-33 which requires considerable forward stick pressure to maintain position on tow, a distracted glider pilot, and a ****ty tug tow hook was a sure set up for another dead tow pilot. Andy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
trailer towing - going rate US? | Gary Emerson | Soaring | 0 | August 21st 08 02:38 PM |
Question: Standard rate turns, constant rate turns, and airspeed | Robert Barker | Piloting | 5 | April 15th 07 04:47 PM |
Rate your FBO | [email protected] | Products | 1 | November 16th 05 01:47 AM |
Calling it how he sees it...Tom Knauff on the glider accident rate | Stewart Kissel | Soaring | 3 | August 10th 05 02:57 AM |
Reducing the Accident Rate | Snowbird | Piloting | 92 | July 22nd 04 01:31 PM |