![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/30/11 4:58 PM, UIO Spotter wrote:
/snip/ NOW, on the 340, I was reading the manuals and the takeoff procedures say MIXTURE RICH. Now. I have some doubt. As we are taking off from 9 thousand feet I find it hard to believe the mixture needs to be rich! And based on my experience thats not right. The books don't say anything regarding high altitude takeoffs so Im lost. Is it correct to take this plane off with the mixtures rich regardless of the altitude? In the MAXIMUM CLIMB checklist you see the following 1. Power 2700 Full Throttle Below 20,000FT 2. Airspeed 108 3. *Mixtures FULL RICH BELOW 20,000FT LEAN AS REQUIRED ABOVE 20,000FT* ....... This is the only LIST or thing I could see regarding Maximum Climbs etc, but I will keep on looking. So, whats your take on this guys? I believe id be killing my performance with the engines at that rate of fuel flow. But thats why I am asking. We used to take it off like that, we had a long takeoff roll, but it had a good rational climb. But tell me what you think /snip/ Stefano, The big difference here is that the 340's engines are turbocharged, and have altitude compensated fuel injection pumps. The engine in the 172XP you flew did *not* have either of those features. To make a long story short, Cessna's published leaning procedures are correct, i.e full rich below 20,000 ft., for full power takeoffs and climb. This is because the turbochargers will provide the engines with Sea Level manifold pressures up in to the 12-15,000 ft. range, and the injection pumps will automatically lean for best full rich performance above those altitudes. Happy Flying! Scott Skylane |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
High altitude Helicycle | Stu Fields | Rotorcraft | 8 | August 18th 09 08:41 PM |
High altitude flutter - Vne | bildan | Soaring | 58 | January 8th 09 08:04 PM |
High Altitude Linnies | TTaylor at cc.usu.edu | Soaring | 4 | August 4th 06 10:47 PM |
High altitude & RPM | abripl | Home Built | 1 | September 1st 05 12:12 AM |
High Altitude operations (Turbo charge???) | Andre | Home Built | 68 | July 11th 03 11:59 PM |