|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#9
February 14th 04, 03:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 19:20:53 +1100, John Cook
wrote: On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 01:58:12 GMT, Scott Ferrin wrote: The reason is that the usefulness of the system is degraded as fewer aircraft are bought. There is a point at which even a brillient system becomes marginal when so few are brought into service, However the massive cost remains the same. How many would you consider adequate for the USAF.. 150 is a joke, so choose a figure higher than this that is still worth the cost.. Its difficult isn't it... The impression I'd got was that the Air Force is convinced it can get 295 if the funding was just left alone ie. stable, so they could try to work the problem. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 40 | October 3rd 08 03:13 PM |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 1st 04 02:31 PM |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | September 2nd 04 05:15 AM |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 1 | January 2nd 04 09:02 PM |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |
Threaded Mode