![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/26/2011 4:13 PM, Walt Connelly wrote:
I have seen a number of glider advertised and most tell you the total time. Unlike a powered airplane which has a tach or a Hobbs meter, gliders seldom have any built in way to determine the actually time on the air frame. While people might try to inflate their personal flying time, I would not be surprised if many of these gliders are low balling their actual air frame time which I presume has a lifetime limit in one way or another. Is there any reasonably foolproof/accurate way to determine the true time on an airframe? I cant think of one. Walt A couple of thoughts... - My understanding of 'German glass' (the glider world 'certification pioneers') is that early (Glasflugel & Schleicher & probably others) pre-carbon-ed airframes were LBA-overseen-tested to 18,000 hours, then (originally) certified to 1/6 of that, or the 'magic' 3,000 hours you'll sooner or later encounter in the glider world. As airframes/types reached 3,000 hours, additional certification depended upon them passing detailed inspections with the results forwarded/blessed by the LBA in 3,000 hour increments. I believe some airframes have now been certified up to 12,000 hours (Twin Grobs? LS-4's?). It'd be great if knowledgeable Europeans will see fit to chime in here... - 'Pure glass' gliders are necessarily 'overstrong' (i.e. designed to stiffness, rather than strength criteria [the latter being typical of aluminum and wood gliders and airplanes]), in order to demonstrate 'usefully high' flutter-free useable airspeeds. - I'm unaware of any evidence of fatigue-related aging issues in any first-generation glass ships' composites. (The metal bits are a different story, of course...) Based on the above, my conclusion is potential owners of 1st-generation glass gliders have little to fret about in ship-life terms, at least of the plastic bits, regardless of whether one is purchasing from an apparent 'squirrel' or from Diogenes' sought-after human. Regards, Bob W. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
In your country how many hours in a glider can count towards therequirements for a power license? | Markus Graeber | Soaring | 5 | December 18th 08 04:06 AM |
PPL(H) Hours 8.4 to 12.1 | Simon Robbins | Rotorcraft | 3 | October 3rd 05 03:16 PM |
3 Down in last 24 hours | thepearl | Rotorcraft | 0 | September 25th 05 04:29 PM |
PPL(H) Hours 5.9 to 8.4 | Simon Robbins | Rotorcraft | 2 | September 23rd 05 05:30 PM |
Glider hours count towards ATP? | Michael | Soaring | 1 | November 9th 03 02:24 AM |