![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 21, 6:49*am, wrote:
On 5/20/2011 9:46 PM, ZL wrote: I don't remember the previous testing NOTAMS showing such widespread low level effects. Anyone have any real life experience with this? This advisory starts next Monday, so maybe the Albuquerque club can let us know. There are numerous news stories, that would indicate the NOTAM refers to testing for the FCC certification of Lightspeed's use of an adjacent frequency spectrum, to one of the GPS signal frequencies, for a nationwide 4G broadband network.http://www.insidegnss.com/node/2589 Lightspeed's final FCC license approval is contingent upon proving that their broadband signal will not interfere with GPS signals. Tests, prior to the current NOTAM, have indicated there is some level of interference. Thanks for the info. I wondered if this NOTAM had anything to do with this Lightspeed mess. Tim "EY" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Even MORE on Testing!! | Veeduber[_2_] | Home Built | 5 | July 18th 09 04:38 PM |
More on Testing | Veeduber[_2_] | Home Built | 2 | July 18th 09 04:02 PM |
Oil testing, which oil | [email protected] | Soaring | 2 | December 6th 07 03:51 PM |
Testing the Testing of Mogas | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 22 | July 24th 06 09:38 PM |
testing | Richard Hollenberg | Soaring | 0 | September 22nd 03 02:29 AM |