![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A friend of mine recently was involved in an outlanding accident. It
seems as though having an engine on-board would help to avoid outlandings and therefore outlanding accidents. If there are any generalities to be made, which are generally more reliable for airstarts - sustainer systems or self-launch systems? My question refers to gasoline systems and not electrics. And yes I understand that no system is completely reliable and one should always have a safe-landing site available even with an on-board engine. Thanks. Tom |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Reliability and Clubs... | [email protected] | Piloting | 23 | August 27th 06 04:27 PM |
Engines and Reliability | Dylan Smith | Piloting | 13 | June 30th 04 03:27 PM |
Reliability of O-300 | Captain Wubba | Owning | 13 | March 9th 04 12:17 AM |
Jabiru V Rotax reliability? | Joe | Home Built | 11 | September 5th 03 11:09 AM |
Space Junk & GPS Reliability | Doug Carter | Instrument Flight Rules | 9 | July 11th 03 01:38 PM |