![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello Andreas Maurer, you wrote at 07.28.2011 03:21
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 03:06:29 -0700 (PDT), " wrote: Radios reliable??? Funny, my job for today (I work for avionics shop) is to find out what's wrong with 4 glider's radios for a local club...... Sometimes I wonder why things that work all over the world don't seem to work in the US... like radios in gliders. ![]() A failed radio is pretty much unknown in the part of the world where I live. I didn't know that German technology was that far advanced. ![]() in which part of the german world ;-) do you live? At my gliding club here in northern Germany we have had severeal failures of radios in our gliders over the last years. Disconnected speaker, stuck transmit button, electric installation failure, and so on. None of them causing a fatality or even an accident, fortunately. Think your statistics ain't representative ... :-) On my airfield a radio call stopped a pilot from ruining his day twice within the last six weeks. Huh - the *same* pilot? Says a lot about the pilot [sigh] ... the same pilot ... :-/ - but he's the type of guy who would be a typical candidate to confuse rudder waggle and release unexpectedly. So how he managed not to misunderstand the radio calls? ;- I agree, radios are rather reliable, but your eyes are more. And under bad circumstances a radio call may be poorly readable, misunderstood, .... so two simple signals (rudder wag / wing rock) should be safer. But the accidents corresponding with them *did* occur ... I don't have the solution. In my opinion one should: 1. give no signal before misinterpretation is not likely to be harmful (i.E. before sufficient height is gained), whenever possible 2. if necessary, give a radio call (like "glider on tow, check your airbrakes") /followed/ by the corresponding signal (rudder wag) .... risk of misinterpretation should be less, then. Just my 2 ct. regards Werner |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rudder waggle | toad | Soaring | 33 | November 21st 07 05:44 AM |
DG Rudder AD - DONE! - Notes from my work | ContestID67 | Soaring | 0 | March 30th 06 07:36 PM |
CH Rudder pedals, why don't they work | wan2fly99 | Simulators | 2 | January 12th 06 12:30 PM |
signal splitter | Tri-Pacer | Home Built | 2 | November 5th 05 09:47 PM |