"The New Soldier" by John Kerry et al

On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 12:14:39 GMT, Fred J. McCall
wrote:

Peter Skelton wrote:

:On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 03:05:59 GMT, Fred J. McCall
wrote:
:
:Peter Skelton wrote:
:
::On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:58:21 GMT, Fred J. McCall
wrote:
::
::Peter Skelton wrote:
::
:::On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 01:00:34 -0500, "John Keeney"
wrote:
:::
:::
:::"Fred J. McCall" wrote in message
:::news:g6pa30tkmdq7db5b8b2efb2nhl38cpip6j@4ax .com...
::: Peter Skelton wrote:
:::
::: :On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:41:57 GMT, Fred J. McCall
::: wrote:
::: :
::: :Peter Skelton wrote:
::: :
::: ::Bush simply hopped the fence the other way.
::: :
::: :Where is your evidence for this?
::: :
::: :His national guard servicce was obviously less than enthusiastic
::: r are you trying to imply that he is anti military today.
:::
::: There is a big difference between serving with little enthusiasm for
::: going to war (although you have no evidence even for that) and a
::: transition from 'anti-war' to 'pro-war', which would be "hopped the
::: fence the other way".
:::
::: :Fred, you've got to ask the stupidest questions on usenet, and
::: :that's saying a lot.
:::
::: It only seems that way to you because they are questions attempting to
::: clarify the stupidest **** ever said on Usenet ... usually by you.
:::
:::Now, Fred, Peter does say some odd things but no where near as
:::stupid as some of the NAZIs in Area 51 crap.
:::
:::The reason it's so easy to tie Fred up is that he over-reacts.
:::Here he's trying to argue that Bush's attitude to the military
:::has been constant
::
::No. Not what I said at all. Work on your reading skills, Peter.
::
::I've claimed that Bush has gone from lukewarm to strongly pro,
:
:No, you compared him to John Kerry and said he "crossed the fence
:going the other way". Now, let's look at what that means.
:
:Kerry went from volunteering for service to being a major anti-war
:figure and claiming that pretty much all of the military were war
:criminals.
:
:In your f*g dreams he did. You clearly have not read what he's
:said.

Also in front of Congress and as part of a major veterans group called
'Vietnam Veterans Against the War'. This brings us to the throwing of
(what were apparently someone else's) medals in protest. What he says
about it NOW is quite different than what he was saying back then.

You didn't read that either? Why am I not surprised?

:Now we know what your problem is. Go away and learn something
:about the subject.

And now we know what your problem is, too. You're still a liar who
continually resorts to insult in preference to fact, changing your
past statements however necessary to allow you to continue to spew
your vomit.

When are you going to make a statement that has something to do
with the issue?

Your problem is obvious:

No signal; all noise.

No wheat; all chaff.

No Peter; all dick.

No more; all gone.

plonk

whatever

Peter Skelton