![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:58:13 GMT, "John R Weiss"
wrote: Hey John R., A valiant effort at trying to discredit what I posted, nice try. We can exploit different systems and use them in ways they were not intended. Part of a skippers fitreps are gauged at how he develops new and unique tactics, I'm sure you know that already. I think you are wrong about your insinuation I am not correct in what I posted. I beleive you need to get in the loop and find out what the acronyms SIGINT and ELINT really mean, and how the spook community uses them. Good on ya for your development of AWG-21/Standard ARM tactics, pretty cool, but whatever you want to call them, it ain't SIGINT/ELINT. I only know about the Prowler from my experience as MMCO, and 3 cruises with Prowlers, we never did any of what the intelligence community calls SIGINT/ELINT. The ALQ-99 Receivers do a great job at picking up, analyzing and targeting what has already been programmed in, but it still ain't SIGINT/ELINT. I also have been in a Viking squadron (3 cruises) , P-3's (6 deployments) and currently EP-3's. I also did some work with VQ-5's det (ES-3's) in Misawa in 95. I didn't think I was out of the loop, but by your definitions, to you I am, so thanks for enlightning me on those whatever you want to call them tactics you guys developed 20 years ago. That loop has been closed for 15 years. Also what you are saying is I am wrong and that the Growler will be used for SIGINT/ELINT??? Show us please? "fudog50" wrote... You really are out of the loop R.David. 1.) The Prowler was never a a SIGINT/ELINT platform and never will be, nor will the "Growler". Maybe you are the one out of the loop... The Prowler has significant SIGINT/ELINT capabilities, even though it is not a "dedicated" SIGINT platform. When I was flying Standard ARM equipped A-6s in the early 80s, we worked closely with the Prowlers to develop tactical capabilities in those regimes. Even the AWG-21 system in the A-6 had some SIGINT/ELINT capability (better with the missile seeker)... 2.) The S-3 has been used for 6 years now, and still is the primary tanker, what are you guys talking about? The S-3 is a good overhead tanker, and a workable mission tanker, but cannot be used in an escort tanker role because of its speed limitations. That limitation means more rendezvous will have to take place for on-station tanking, because the tanker cannot go with the strike group. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|