![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chad Irby wrote:
:In article , : Fred J. McCall wrote: : : I always considered that they'd paste such things with persistent : chemicals, instead. Kill all the depots that way. While we sometimes : claim that we would go nuclear in the face of a chemical attack, would : we really have done it? : : I'm unconvinced we would have done so against the Soviet Union. : :If the USSR was into the realm of dropping planeloads of chemicals on :depots and such, it's hard to imagine that the war wouldn't have crossed :into the "screw 'em, what have we got ready to launch?" phase. : :They built tactical nukes for a *reason*, you know. Yes, they did, and the Soviets had their share of them. Would we have fired the first one in response to a chemical attack in the face of "if you shoot a nuke, we'll empty our magazines back at you after YOUR first use"? I still don't think so, unless there wasn't another choice. -- "Rule Number One for Slayers - Don't die." -- Buffy, the Vampire Slayer |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|