2D thrust vectoring for the F-35A and F-35C?

Scott Ferrin wrote:

On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 03:19:41 GMT, "Thomas Schoene"
wrote:

Scott Ferrin wrote:


Nope. The X-32 would have but not the 35. My guess is they could
have but maybe Lockhhed didn't want it competing with the F-22.

Or they didn't want to pay the weight penalty in an aircraft designed for
strike over air-to-air.

I recently suggested that if the F/A-22 were canceled, the Air Force might
look at an air-to-air version of JSF. An axi-symetrical thrust vectoring
nozzle would be high on the list of desirable modifications for such an
aircraft, I suspect.


I'd think they'd have to make quite a few changes to make it good
enough to be the primary air to air fighter. Internal weapon load is
tiny (2 -120s), the thrust to weight leaves a lot to be desired, and
how does it fair in the manueverability dept.? Sure you can add
external weapons but then there goes your stealth. Then when the
politicians start screaming because the F-35's cost is going up and
service date is getting pushed back so the required changes can be
incorporated. . .

I used to despair.. Bradley, Sgt. York, Osprey, Crusader, The F-22
selection disaster.. - Oh Hell, they're falling like the Brits.. But
now I rejoice. DIE Commanche! DIE Raptor. May you blunder in your
rotten moral failing forever. May all your thumbs be left. May F-35
be interminably cursed by your obese, contemptible innate rottenness..
I turn away, I turn away in promise to the fast rising and glorious
East.. I turn away, and behind me..may the rotted Whore of Babylon die
soon! Rotted, rancid and befouled, forever.

Grantland