![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.reuters.com/locales/newsA...toryID=4492902
"It does not appear that an aircraft as advanced and expensive as the Raptor is required to address near-term defense threats," Christopher Bolkcom, chief military aviation anlayst of the non-partisan Congressional Research Service, told a panel of the House Armed Services Committee. .... Bolkcom said the Raptor's 540-nautical mile unrefueled combat radius dictated it operated from forward bases -- another drawback for a Pentagon facing potential conflict in distant lands with perhaps scant bases nearby from which to operate. Nothing can stop the US Air Force, once they have a permission slip. -HJC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|