If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Attention US Standard Class Pilots
As the owner of an ASW 24, I support the proposed handicapping system
for Std. Class and I applaud the Rules Committee for pursuing this idea. I don't think my ASW 24 needs it, but I'll take it whatever help I can get. Lots of good thoughts already posted. I share concern over the future of Std. Class. The reason a handful of top pilots still fly there is because they can qualify to go to the World Championships. The day the FAI Standard Class disappears is the day those guys (and Sarah) stop showing up. It's the same reason many of them started showing up at the Sports Class Nationals. I'm OK with that. Contrary to some of the complaints about the top pilots "spoiling" the Sports Class for less- experienced pilots, I WANT to fly against the top talent in our sport. I learn more. I evaluate myself against the best. And, as a result, I enjoy competition flying more, though I know any success I enjoy will be uneven. I'm not trying to spark another discussion about Sport Class but I do see some parallels here regarding viability and appeal. Beyond my admitted self interest in insuring viable FAI classes where I can fly (e.g., Montague and Parowan--my most likely venues--are both out of reach this summer, being 4 days away), I'm glad to see this proposal for what it says about recognizing the "real world" problems facing competitive soaring, which have to do with money, time, and life style. It's easy to get caught up in the quest for ever- increasing performance--whether it's a new sailplane or a new vario- flight computer--and in the "purity" of top-level competition. We can forget that ours is a tiny sport that is difficult to learn and even more difficult to afford. Soaring will never have mass appeal, but this proposal will help make at least the Standard Class--of which there are many great sailplanes in this country--a little more attractive. I do concede that this proposal opens the door for the Std. Class being subsumed into the 15M class. I wouldn't have a big philosophical problem with that. The performance differences are relatively small and I like big contests with lots of good pilots. I think the proliferation of classes over time has been marked by incremental improvements for small numbers of pilots (often most able to afford a new sailplane) but a gradually deteriorating economic outlook for the sport overall: i.e., less stability, higher cost to compete in any given class, smaller fields (read: less attractive to host a contest), and lower attractiveness of contests to sponsors (see below). Advocates of free enterprise would observe that contest organizers have, for some years now, being doing commercially what we will likely end up doing "officially" anyway: i.e., merging multiple classes of national and regional contests to cover the substantial fixed costs and achieve the necessary economies of scale. On that subject, I'll throw in something no one else has mentioned. I flew my first contest in 1968. I realize we live in a different world now (duh!). When I was a kid, my family accompanied my father to his contests--and had fun. There were always other kids and entertaining stuff to do. The contests were big and well organized. My twin girls benefited from some of the same things when they came along later although in recent years the number of young people at a national contest has dropped even more precipitously than the number of crews, which in turn has shrunk even faster than the number of pilots. Going to a nationals or big regionals just doesn't strike me as something most pilots can pitch to their families as a vacation anymore. And that's not a good thing. It just makes it more difficult for even a dedicated contest pilot to justify taking off for several weeks for the boondocks of America to indulge his desire to fly. I've done it three ways: with my entire family (great fun when done right), solo (fun but different), and the last time with one of my daughters (she and I both had a great time despite miserable weather and some of my worst flying ever). So I will say strongly that anything we can do to make our sport appealing and accessible to any of the parties involved, whether it's owners of not-quite-latest-technology sailplanes or family members or contest sponsors, is a good thing. Thanks, UH/QT/BB and the rest of the Committee for floating this idea. It's an example of the kind of thinking we need. Chip Bearden ASW 24 "JB" U.S.A. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Attention Region 12 Pilots! | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | January 4th 12 06:19 AM |
next gen standard class? | ric375 | Soaring | 7 | February 3rd 10 10:15 PM |
USA: Attention New York State Pilots | Tim Hanke | Soaring | 0 | June 28th 06 08:06 PM |
Attention French Pilots! | MK | Soaring | 1 | November 8th 04 06:10 PM |
US Standard Class and World Class Nationals at Hobbs | Ken Sorenson | Soaring | 7 | July 16th 04 04:03 AM |