![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a number of ratings. I approached training for each them the
same way. I got my glider ratings in an extremely informal club environment and my airplane ratings at small Part 61 flight schools. My goals we 1. Get the rating in the minimum time at the minimum cost. 2. Achieve the highest level of competency possible so I would be safe exercising the privileges of the rating. 3. Work out a plan to maintain that competency. I strongly advocate the this approach to all students. The ones who accept the advice, do extremely well. The ones who "just show up" once every month or so expecting the instructor to do everything get frustrated and start pointing fingers at the "system" whatever it happens to be. I knew I could not achieve my goals if my approach were "passive" so I took charge of my training. First, I read books to prepare for the written. If a weekend "cram class" was available, I took it. Then I took practice exams until I could consistently score in the high 90's. When I had done this, I took the actual written. With the written in hand, I was ready to start flight instruction. I sat down with my instructor to work out a syllabus suited for me. With the syllabus in hand, I again hit the books. At the beginning of each flight instruction session, my instructor and I discussed the session in advance to assure I had all the knowledge required and thoroughly understood what would be expected of me. We then flew off that part of the syllabus. Some instructors were not amenable to this so I found other instructors. Using this approach, I took the check rides for all my new ratings with the minimum hours the FAA allows - and passed. As an example, I took my instrument checkride with 40.1 hours of instruction in my logbook. 20 of these were simulator time and 20.1 were in-flight hood time. Even with a new rating in hand I knew I still had lots to learn. I searched for pilots with years of experience doing what I wanted to do. It didn't matter if they were instructors or not. I was looking for practical knowledge, not logbook endorsements. An example was a pilot who flew packages for FedEx in a Caravan. He was out in the weather every night as a single pilot IFR operation. I learned more about single-pilot bad-weather flying from him than I could from any instructor. For many years, whether I was instrument current or not, I took a "competency check" flight every six months with a different CFII. Then, I took great care never to fly into a situation which would push me to the limits of that competency. I think this saved me several times. I just re-took my CFI-G check ride as I do every 2 years. I could just go to a FIRC bull session or get the FAA to renew my certificate but I choose to do it the hard way for my benefit and my students. To summarize, students need to take charge of their training - it's their butt on the line. No one else has as much at stake. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Student | Tim[_6_] | Piloting | 0 | October 30th 07 06:09 PM |
CFI in IMC with Student | Roy Page | Owning | 36 | December 14th 05 06:43 PM |
Inspiration by friends - mutal interest and motivation to get the PPL | Gary G | Piloting | 1 | October 29th 04 09:19 PM |
Student as PIC in IMC? | Geo. Anderson | Instrument Flight Rules | 40 | May 29th 04 05:09 PM |
IFR student | Gerald Sylvester | Instrument Flight Rules | 22 | December 14th 03 01:47 PM |