A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

WGC2012 Uvalde Scoring



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9  
Old August 14th 12, 11:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Ron Gleason
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 483
Default WGC2012 Uvalde Scoring

On Tuesday, 14 August 2012 16:32:02 UTC-5, (unknown) wrote:
On Tuesday, August 14, 2012 4:57:31 PM UTC-4, Tony wrote:

On Tuesday, August 14, 2012 3:51:22 PM UTC-5, BobD wrote: On Tuesday, August 14, 2012 3:26:02 PM UTC-5, soartech wrote: Evan says: I see a 500' zoomie. What is a "zoomie" and what's so bad about it? I'm assuming he finished 500' below the finish cylinder edge and zoomed up to kill speed and gain altitude for getting to the pattern. In previous tasks they've declared a 15k cylinder with a 3,000ft minimum altitude base. They do this because weather had forecasted a gust front from approaching T-storms to the north of Uvalde. They want to give the pilot the option to get a valid finish then break off a glide to the airport should the gusts get strong. The breakoff would then be a decision to landout or go to another air strip. Hitting the 15k cylinder and keeping yourself at 3,000agl+ is tricky as most have never done final glides to a target like that. The "zoomie" is dangerous at any finish cylinder because you're zooming up at what might be the majority of gliders finishing above the floor limit. Hence the penalty points. the dangerous action was at 15:24, about 14 minutes after he started.




This is consistent with a very agressive pull up into a thermal, likely occupied by a gaggle, and triggering a safety complaint, followed by appropriate invesygation and review.

Speculation on my part.

Bet this calms things down quick

UH


The discussion so far has no identified the REAL problem. I encourage you to download the flight, define the task and have all flight parameters defined and figure out the serious penalty, which is in fact a zero for the day, because it is not the first time this pilot has done this infraction during the competition, including practice days.

yes I know the answer but you serious RAS folks should be able to figure this out on your own.

Ron Gleason
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WGC2012 Uvalde Launch/Landing and US Team audio feed Tony[_5_] Soaring 12 August 17th 12 04:34 PM
OLC Scoring [email protected] Soaring 2 June 13th 06 03:01 AM
OLC scoring - USA Ian Cant Soaring 18 November 29th 05 07:43 PM
OLC scoring - USA Ian Cant Soaring 0 November 28th 05 03:09 AM
TAT scoring question Mark Zivley Soaring 34 September 6th 04 04:55 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.