A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Personal flight computers



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #23  
Old December 11th 12, 12:18 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Andrzej Kobus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 585
Default Personal flight computers

On Dec 9, 1:10*pm, Evan Ludeman wrote:
On Dec 9, 12:02*pm, "Dan Marotta" wrote:

Gotta admit that I haven't had the privilege of flying a ClearNav, but I
find XCSoar extremely easy to use and I'll bet that if I got a flight in a
glider with CN, I'd find it complex and confusing.


Naw, a five minute briefing on CN will get all the essentials. *It's
designed that way.

CN setup is less than 1/10 of what it takes to get XCSoar going. *No
exaggeration.

Power comes up a lot. *CN isn't as bad as some imagine. *400 mA is
typical average.

Evan Ludeman for CNi
For more CNi discussion, please see our forumhttp://www.clearnav.net


I fly with CN and Streak as a backup. Yes I have a moving map backup
to be able to avoid airspace violations if primary instrument fails.
In short CN is the easiest to use software available today. I still
have a wish list for some CN updates but even if they don't happen I
am still very happy with it. The Streak runs XCSoar and I must say
that with each XCSoar release I feel XCSoar is getting closer to how
CN functions e.g. task optimization, requiring less workload. I used
to use LK8000 but its task support was not as good as XCSoar. I feel
LK8000 is perfect for X-C flying but for contests there are other
choices. I also used WinPilot Pro in the past and I liked it but that
was years ago. I have never flown with SeeYou Mobile.

If I were to do it again:
1) Non competition flying I would buy in this order: Oudie with LK8000
followed by Streak with XCSoar
2) Competition flying: CN followed by Streak with XCSoar

One thing I find problematic with XCSoar is some very small fonts and
that is one of the reasons LK8000 is rated better for non-comp flying.

Now in regards to power use. My CN drained my batteries a couple of
times totally, and yes I found CN still works at 8.5 volts, . On one
battery I have 302, CN and a 2 year old Dittel radio (I don't talk
much). My battery lasted about 5 hours. Since then I am very careful
and I always use CN in PowerSave mode. On max brightness you need to
have good power supply. My next batteries will be the K2s so I can
feed the beast (I mean CN). Despite the power hungry CN I still think
it is the best unit for comp flying not so for pleasure.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question about flight computers Some Other Guy Piloting 0 December 5th 10 12:02 AM
In Flight computers and softwa Walt Connelly Soaring 15 November 21st 10 01:01 AM
Zander 940/941 or ZS-1 Flight Computers??? Tim[_2_] Soaring 8 August 10th 08 10:01 PM
Zander flight computers rhwoody Soaring 0 May 7th 08 04:30 AM
FS slide rule flight computers Military Aviation 0 April 19th 04 03:29 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.