Hiroshima/Nagasaki vs conventional B-17 bombing

"hiroshima facts" wrote in message
om...
"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message
...

Nope. You need to change your nickname from "Hiroshima Facts" to
"Hiroshima
Fantasies".

This was a poor substitute for an intelligent argument.



Had half the population of Hiroshima died then the death toll
there would have been well over 100K, which is plainly not the case.

"Half the affected area" and "half the population of the city" are not
necessarily the same thing.

I think you are going to have to very carefully define what *you*
mean by "the affected area". You apparently don't mean to include
the entire cities of Hiroshima & Nagasaki. I would like to see your
interpretation of "the affected area" as applied to Tokyo as well.