A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

(USA) FlarmNet usage



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8  
Old April 25th 13, 09:00 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
John Carlyle
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 324
Default (USA) FlarmNet usage

Thanks, Paul, that answers questions about three of the license items.

Can you shed light on the other extra cost options listed in the V2.79 release notes? Specifically, in the US, are the Audio (AUD), the Second FLARM antenna connection (RFB, and the Garmin TIS output (TIS)extra cost options?

Thanks in advance.

-John, Q3

On Thursday, April 25, 2013 3:31:08 PM UTC-4, Paul Remde wrote:
Hi John,

The U.S. price for PowerFLARM Core and Portable includes IGC Approval as
standard. That has been the plan from the start. In Europe it is an
option.

Engine Noise Level functionality has always been promoted as an extra cost
option in the USA.

Best Regards,

Paul Remde
Cumulus Soaring, Inc.
__________________________

"John Carlyle" wrote in message
...

Thanks for the "heads-up", Evan.

The release notes are very interesting. FLARM is now going to charge a fee
for (among other things):

* Engine Noise Level recording (ENL)
* IGC approval (IGC)
* Second FLARM antenna connection (RFB)

If this scheme is applicable to the US, too, then I'll be using my
Volkslogger along with PowerFLARM. At least I'll get an IGC approved flight
trace good for up to world records (OK, stop laughing) with engine noise
monitoring - for free.

-John, Q3


On Thursday, April 25, 2013 8:49:25 AM UTC-4, Evan Ludeman wrote:
It works and it's here (in beta) now.

http://www.powerflarm.aero/index.php...ge-and-support

I don't use or care much about flarmnet, but I do recommend the 2.79 beta
because it appears to have better pcas sensitivity and reliability and it
allows one to easily update the display to 3.1, which improves readability
significantly.

Sure wish they'd chuck those silly, useless pcas circles on the butterfly
displays in favor of digital range information (like Zaon). I've
suggested this, without reply. If you agree, or have a better idea, I'd
encourage you to make your opinion known.

Evan Ludeman / T8


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PF Portable and Flarmnet Andy[_1_] Soaring 0 October 5th 12 02:55 PM
FLARMnet file update Andy[_1_] Soaring 1 September 25th 12 06:59 PM
FlarmNet Brad[_2_] Soaring 6 August 26th 12 06:35 PM
Usage fee process Danny Deger Piloting 3 April 11th 07 08:27 PM
Oil usage GE Owning 14 May 20th 04 07:22 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.