A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Jacks Mountain Wind Turbine Letters Needed.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old December 18th 13, 06:03 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Karl Striedieck[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 146
Default Jacks Mountain Wind Turbine Letters Needed.


As noted before, the soaring at Mifflin could be negatively impacted by the installation of dozens of 450' high wind turbines on Jacks Mountain. Last night at the meeting of SOAR (Save Our Allegheny Ridges) the matter of FAA approval for these potential obstructions was discussed and a request for input from pilots was made.

The particular issue involving the FAA concerns the closest four of the 20 turbines Volkswind is proposing for its initial project. But the installation of any of these devices will render the ridge unsafe for any front/back side ridge flying that is important to Mifflin as a soaring site. This is because Jacks has a very narrow peak.

Following are links to three documents pertinent to a letter to the FAA. The first is an explanatory e-mail form Laura Jackson, head of SOAR. The second is a copy of a letter David Bargainier wrote. And third is a letter from the AOPA to the FAA on the subject.


http://mifflin.ridgesewing.com/Appeal_from_SOAR.pdf



http://mifflin.ridgesewing.com/Pilot...ion_Letter.pdf



http://mifflin.ridgesewing.com/APOA_...ion_Letter.pdf

Letters from pilots to the FAA can be brief summaries of your concern that approval of this project will present an unacceptable safety hazard to pilots, and any other reasons you might find useful from the AOPA and David's letters.

Thanks for the support.

Stay tuned.

kS



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FAA Blessing for Blue Mountain or Rocky Mountain instruments??? dave Home Built 2 May 26th 06 01:56 PM
User opinion needed: Blue mountain avionics EFIS Luc JOB Home Built 2 April 11th 06 04:55 AM
User opinion needed: Blue mountain avionics EFIS Luc JOB Products 0 April 6th 06 03:26 PM
GSC prop as wind turbine??? clare at snyder.on.ca Home Built 11 March 18th 06 12:07 PM
Turbine Duke or turbine Baron? Montblack Piloting 1 December 13th 05 04:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.