![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jay" wrote ...
There was someone that commented that if 2 lifting surfaces made sense, you'd see the 777 with 2 wings because they're Boeing and have lots of money and super human engineers. I've worked for lots of companies like Boeing (but not them because they tried to low ball me) and they're made up of regular guys like you and me. Many of them have interests and responsibility outside of designing the best aircraft ever, and really just want to pay their bills and go home and have a beer. You work as one guy in a huge machine where decisions are often made on what's politicaly the best answer rather than what's technically best. You get one tiny componant of this huge project. These kinds of organizations often punish risk taking in that there is no upside pay-off if you're right. But if you're wrong, and it was because you did something different than before, you get hammered. So the larger the project, the more conservative the approach tends to be. Remember, bean counters hate risk of any kind. Bull****, Jay. I worked for several years as an engineer in Boeing's Aero Staff. Everything you just said is wrong. The people that design wings at Boeing use the best technology available that's consistant with the production materials that are available. They don't design on the basis of some political whim. They don't design biplanes because it's easy to show mathematically that the mutual interference between the circulation of the two wings decreases the efficiency of both wings. You seem to have strange theory that just because something isn't done it must be a good thing to try. Subsonic aerodynamics was well explored by World War II. Much of transonic and supersonic flow was understood shortly after. If you think that you've come up with something new that just means you don't understand why thinks work. If you want do to something different just to be different go ahead, but it will be an inferior product and possibly dangerous. Your current design has at least three fatal flaws. You need to open some books and understand the theory of flight before you start designing airplanes. Rich |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Looking for a fast light plane | Dave lentle | Home Built | 2 | August 6th 03 03:41 AM |
Glass Goose | Dr Bach | Home Built | 1 | August 3rd 03 05:51 AM |