![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Andreas" wrote in message ... In article , "Tarver Engineering" wrote: The usual process since the early 90's. You are way behind the power curve Harry. Have a look at the fleet numbers for reliabilty for the F/A-18E vs the F-14s. Think about how the F-22's target number compares. snip of non-sequiturs You're trying to teach me what exactly? Even if the F-22 were to hit it's target it would remain inferior. Been there, done that, doing it presently, with COTS and high reliability. BTW, the current system I'm working has a reliability number higher than the airframe life. COTS in a vacuum is a disaster waiting to happen. Do you mean that your application of my RPL model is driving your COTS application, as it is everywhere outside USAF and even with the F-35, or do you mean you are just making the numbers up? The sample of Mil-Hbk 217F is dependant on certain procedures and processes, as are all of the related datum. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|