![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not unusual. I cross the fence at 100 knots in the Twin Comanche and land
at 85 knots or so on a normal length runway. John Stricker "Corky Scott" wrote in message ... On 19 Nov 2003 17:16:03 -0800, (Jay) wrote: "It's just one of the risks you take when you play the game with a single-engine aircraft," he said. Well said Mr. Swears. 90MPH was the slowest he could get it before he went into the drink? Just taking a guess, but if he was heading for San Francisco at this time, his airplane must have been pretty heavily loaded. I've always been impressed with how high the landing speed of many of the canards is. This one, at it's max fuel load could easily have been around 80 or so. The guy probably did not want to let it get to the speed where the canard lost lift and the nose pitched down. I think even the Grumman F6F Hellcat landed slower than 90. Corky Scott |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 41 | November 20th 03 05:39 AM |
Objective Engine Discussion | Rick Maddy | Home Built | 26 | October 14th 03 04:46 AM |
FS: O-235C1 Lycoming engine (core) | Del Rawlins | Home Built | 0 | October 8th 03 09:46 PM |
Corky's engine choice | Corky Scott | Home Built | 39 | August 8th 03 04:29 AM |