![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Aerophotos" wrote in message
firstly the us bitches whines etc etc as usual with iraq saying they some kind a threat .. ( beat the drum as loud as want til the people get idea ) next north korea says it can strike anywhere on the usa west coast with long range nuke missiles still the us chases iraq for some obscure reason.. anyone care to tell why north korea which can attack the usa directly suddenly is less a threat???? then iraq who cant even attack the usa anyway and they are still numba 1? Why is NK less of a threat than Iraq? Three reasons; see below. Given how much the US defense budget has been gutted since Reagan, the US had to give up the fiction of being able to fight two simultaneous regional conflicts. So the US concentrates militarily on the greatest threat for now. 1. Previous Real History, not Histrionics Saddam fought wars with three of his neighbors in the past couple of decades (Iran, Kuwait & Saudi Arabia), as well as gassing many of his own people (Kurds) and launching missiles with intent to kill into nearby countries (such as Israel). North Korea, in spite of lots of hot air, has stayed well within their country's boundaries and hasn't invaded anyone. Their missile launches, although provocative, have been aimed into the ocean, not into populated areas. 2. Missiles NK's missiles are still untested and so might or might not be able to reach the US West Coast, although give it a couple of more years and they probably can, but with a very limited throw weight, and not enough accuracy to threaten us militarily (hit a population center perhaps, but not accurate enough for a military target). Saddam, on the other hand, could target many, many more populated areas of people he regarded as an enemy. He also has used his missiles with intent to kill; NK had not (see point #1). 3. Regional Politics Turning Iraq into a stable democracy (please note I didn't say quickly or easily - it took us a generation or two in Germany) in the middle of the Middle East does far more to make the world a safer place than does turning NK into a stable democracy. Look at a geo-political map. For more background (not that you're likely to read anything that's against your prejudices, anyway), see: - North Korean Threat Exaggerated, http://www.fas.org/main/article.jsp?...5&articleId=26 - {FAS is, of course, well know to be such a shill for the Bush Administration :-) } - Taepodong-2 Overview and Assessment, http://www.nti.org/db/profiles/dprk/..._taepo2GO.html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
russian jet pilots in korean war? | ville terminale | Military Aviation | 43 | April 3rd 04 08:06 PM |
Australia to participate in US missile defence program | David Bromage | Military Aviation | 40 | December 13th 03 01:52 PM |
N. Korea Agrees to Nuke Talks | Dav1936531 | Military Aviation | 1 | August 2nd 03 06:53 AM |
N. Korea Threatens Nuke Test | Dav1936531 | Military Aviation | 2 | July 27th 03 09:23 AM |