![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... "Kevin Brooks" wrote in message ... Not originally, from what I have read. IIRC the original composition was reportedly steel with a ceramic layer (or layers), with the DU being added later by the US (I don't recall its being used by the Challenger II?). Brooks Challenger II is officially listed as being protected by second generation Chobham armour, the exact composition os of course secret but the understanding I have is it uses either DU or tungsten in place of the steel in first generation armor Odd, since from what I have read the aggregate weight increase between Challeneger I and Challeneger II is only about 500 kg; OTOH, the change from the M1 to the M1A1 brought a change in weight of about six *tons* (and that change from the 105mm to the 120mm gun did not account for a great deal of that, I'd imagine). How could they have switched to a DU (or tungsten) armor package and only increase the vehicle weight by some thousand pounds plus in the case of Challenger? Brooks Keith |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ~ DEPLETED URANIUM - AMERIKA'S 'OK TO USE' WMD ~ | B2431 | Military Aviation | 2 | March 27th 04 10:39 AM |
| Japanese firm sold Libya uranium conversion plant | Dav1936531 | Military Aviation | 2 | March 17th 04 04:47 PM |
| Mk 84 iron bomb version with depleted uranium? | MCN | Military Aviation | 8 | October 3rd 03 02:56 AM |