![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Pfeiffer tube trailer that my Mosquito came in had an excellent back
door design. The door was hinged on the right side and, when swung open had brackets for rigging tools, grease, rear jack crank, etc. There was a ramp hinged at the middle and bottom which folded up before closing the door. When swung up, the ramp secured the wingtips with padded cuffs. I thought it was a great design, much better than the home built trailers, but you did have to bend over to get inside. Dan Marotta On 11/19/2014 3:19 PM, Bill D wrote: On Wednesday, November 19, 2014 2:45:06 PM UTC-7, Rob Brown wrote: On 2014-08-11, shkdriver wrote: Does anyone have any opinions about the relative benefits of an "alligator" style opening trailer vs a full opening top? Please forgive my reopening an old topic, and for that matter, my general ignorance on the topic for that matter. When I was last involved in the sport 25 years ago, most of the trailers at our club were simple long tubes with a big door at the back, and maybe a small hatch at the front. (Was "Minden Trailer" a brand in those days?) As a sometimes helper during rig and de-rig, it did not seem to add much (or any? my memory is hazy) difficulty to the operation. Yes, you have to bend over to enter the trailer, but I'm not sure how often you would have to do that. Why is it worth the extra expense, weight and complexity (especially in a homebuilt) for a top-opening trailer? To the extent there was a problem with tube trailers, it's that they were too small in cross section. If the builder had added as much as 12 inches to the width and height, it would have been noticeably easier to get gliders in and out of them. Then too, no one ever worked out a really good rear door design. Tubes are inherently stronger and lighter than cam-shell types and probably cheaper to build. Any additional aerodynamic drag incurred with a wider tube probably costs less in fuel than the extra weight of a cam-shell. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
50 shades of grey glider, whose glider is that in the movie trailer | SF | Soaring | 23 | October 16th 14 05:10 AM |
shipping glider to NZ-advice on securing glider in trailer | November Bravo | Soaring | 6 | November 1st 06 02:05 PM |
F.S. 3-glider trailer | Nigel Pocock | Soaring | 0 | September 29th 06 11:29 AM |
glider trailer Q | Ken Ward | Soaring | 10 | August 28th 06 04:27 PM |
glider trailer Q | Steve Leonard | Soaring | 1 | August 28th 06 05:29 AM |