![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When knowledgeable people speak of a vehicle going "X Mach" they are
referencing the speed of the vehicle compared to the speed of sound at local conditions, right? I ask because I've heard NASA folks mentioning that the Shuttle, at some point in it's descent, is going Mach 25. I claim that means the vehicle is going 25 times faster than Mach at that particular pressure and temp where the Shuttle is, while someone else claims NASA means 25 times the sea level value of Mach, even though the Shuttle is in the very upper atmosphere at the time. I know to discount what reporters say, but I'm referring to engineers and their official spokesmen. BTW, I understand the definition of Mach references local conditions. -- Scott -------- It's not a coincidence that pictures that would inflame the Americans to war are not shown extensively while those pictures that undermine our will to fight are shown ad naseum. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
max altitude and Mach 1 Now With Charts | John R Weiss | Military Aviation | 6 | May 15th 04 05:49 PM |
F-22 Comparison | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 39 | December 4th 03 04:25 PM |
WWII warplanes vs combat sim realism | [email protected] | Military Aviation | 37 | November 27th 03 05:24 AM |
The Wright Stuff and The Wright Experience | John Carrier | Military Aviation | 54 | October 12th 03 04:59 AM |
Me-262, NOT Bell X-1 Broke SB First | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 140 | October 10th 03 08:02 PM |