![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, March 3, 2015 at 2:15:10 PM UTC-5, pete purdie wrote:
As Kevin says, the feature sets are pretty compatible. One significant difference is the usability, the Clearnav can be mastered in a few minutes using the 4 page mostly pictorial reference guide, rather than a 68 page manual. The matching CNv vario system is equally usable, and an outstanding multi-sensor vario. Software updates are easily installed from web downloads; there have been 2 factory hardware update in 6 years, the original optional upgrade from 1/4 VGA to full VGA, and now the high speed processor plus even higher brightness/lower power display. At 18:20 03 March 2015, wrote: On Tuesday, March 3, 2015 at 3:36:10 AM UTC-5, wrote: Just wondering if anyone can add to a discussion as to why any of the abo= ve flight computers are better than the others. If you were to purchase on= e, which one would you buy and why? I've been using CN and CNv for five years, and both fully live up to advert= izing. Factory support is excellent. The only thing I'd do differently is= that I'd NOT have a tunnel mount. It looks snazzy, but it's too far away = for these aging eyes. In fact, I think I'd do a pedistal mount for ease of= access. From time to time you will want to send it back to the factory fo= r some sort of update, and a pedistal mount will be much easier to remove t= han digging it out of the bowels of the instrument panel. The feature set of LX9000 is years ahead of ClearNav. I used to fly with ClearNav and I switched to LX9000. I would never switch back to ClearNav for many reasons, the feature set being the most important. I got tired of waiting for simple changes. Anyone who wants to know more about LX9000 please download the LX Styler and play with it to see the power of LX9000. You can make it as complicated as you like or as simple as you like. It is a very flexible platform. The variometers are very similar in terms of performance. I flew with both of them concurrently. Credits to ClearNav; extremely good support probably the best out of all manufacturers. The area task optimizer is quite good as well. I looked seriously at LX Navigation computers before buying the LX9000 but a couple of years ago they had many problems. Their variometer was just upgraded and there is no real experience with it yet. On the other hand LX Navigation will work with CNv and C302 which is awesome. Kudos to LX Navigation for not trying to lock a user to one type of variometer. Their computer is also very configurable so maybe worth looking at. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A Clear Nav, A 1-26, and an Eta | Tony[_5_] | Soaring | 11 | May 21st 10 04:29 PM |
Runway, clear for takeoff | Darius | Piloting | 0 | May 1st 10 03:43 PM |
FOR SALE NEW NK CLEAR NAV | [email protected] | Soaring | 32 | September 22nd 08 01:39 PM |
How to clear CAI 302 flight log memory? | Frank[_1_] | Soaring | 2 | June 19th 07 03:36 AM |
Clear Air Turbolance | Dutch | Aviation Photos | 1 | May 3rd 07 05:31 PM |