A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Bent up wings on Schempp-Hirth and Jonkers glider



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7  
Old May 19th 15, 06:12 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
J. Nieuwenhuize
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 83
Default Bent up wings on Schempp-Hirth and Jonkers glider

Op dinsdag 19 mei 2015 04:38:19 UTC+2 schreef Andy Blackburn:
On Monday, May 18, 2015 at 1:34:15 PM UTC-7, J. Nieuwenhuize wrote:
If we go back to theory, the perfect wing is a double super-ellipse (Lamé curve):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superellipse

Both the top view and the dihedral of the wing should have the shape of a super-ellipse for lowest induced drag for a given bending moment (structural weight) and wetted area (profile drag at high speeds). Both the A350 and the Dreamliner are very close to this ideal:
wallpaperswide.com/download/boeing_787_dreamliner-wallpaper-1920x1200.jpg

Another plus compared to a wing without dihedral and winglets is that the interference drag between the winglet and the wing is much reduced.

Such a gradually curved wing is impossible to build because all the control surfaces would have a bend in them. The wing with sections progressively canted more and more (polyhedral) is a good compromise.

It also helps with flutter apparantly. The Vortex shedding frequency of the various sections make the critical flutter speed for such a wing higher, allowing either a higher VNE, or a less stiff and thus lighter wing structure.

h

Elliptical polyhedral is not part of any drag theory I ever learned studying aerodynamics. The wing planform, airfoils, twist and the use of winglets are used together to optimize the tradeoff between parasitic and induced drag while maintaining desirable handling and stall characteristics. My sense is that use of dihedral (or polyhedral) is mostly motivated by handling (and perhaps ground clearance) considerations rather than performance considerations. They may also think it looks cool.

9B


No, it's not just a matter of handling and cool looks.

Most universities don't go further than lifting line theory. The name already gives away that is has it's issues; it's a 2D theory.
It's not for cosmetic reasons that the first generation of airliners and bizjets that can make use of new understanding and new construction methods all converge to polyhedral wings where the winglets are blended in the wing design.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Schempp-Hirth 2a/2b cockpit fit vs ASW-20? [email protected] Soaring 14 April 9th 12 01:46 PM
schempp-hirth shk-1 shkdriver Soaring 3 September 5th 08 03:38 AM
FS: Schempp-Hirth Discus A Tim Hanke Soaring 0 February 19th 06 02:16 PM
Schempp-Hirth Mel Dawson Soaring 0 February 15th 06 04:08 PM
Schempp Hirth or its Representatives... Chris OCallaghan Soaring 11 September 23rd 03 09:28 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.