![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"...getting the US to attack Iraq for the sake of Israel...."
Would you believe there was actually more to invading Iraq than supporting Israel? In 1991 Iraq agreed to a cease fire, not an armistice. Then for eleven years Iraq violated that cease fire, shooting at our airplanes and supporting Middle East terrorist attacks. Iraq stole the food we provided for starving Iraqi children. Iraq also was bought secret UN support from our deceitful French, Germans and Russian "allies". Under the terms of the cease fire we were justified in striking back at any time in accordance with international law. After exhausting fourteen ineffectual UN resolutions we finally decided to take control of our fight against terrorism. And we did just that, first vanquishing the Taliban in Afghanistan, then Saddam Hussein in Iraq! The results have been: 1. Pakistan is now an ally in fighting terrorism, 2. Libya has stopped developing nuclear weapons, 3. Afghanistan is now free of the Taliban, 4. Every country in the Middle East now fears being next on our Axis of Evil list, 5. Osama's effective authority over terrorism now extends only within the cave he is currently hiding, 6. The butcher of Baghdad, now in prison, will soon be tried by the people he tormented, 7. Iran, the major sponsor of current terrorism, is now squeezed by a free Afghanistan on one side and a free Iraq on the other, 8. The world's terrorists, now clustered in Iraq and not in the USA, are being continually decimated, 9. And, we have had no terrorist attacks whatsoever on American soil in the last three years! It's been a very successful campaign thus far! Only a liberal wimp would believe otherwise. WDA end "MORRIS434" wrote in message ... Subj: Gen. Zinni: Neocons Hijacked US Foreign Policy for Israel Date: 5/23/04 12:42:25 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: To: Sent from the Internet (Details) Friends, Gen. Zinni: Neocons Hijacked US Foreign Policy for Israel On CBS 60 Minutes tonight (Sunday) at 7 EST/PST, Ret. Gen. Anthony Zinni, who once commanded US troops in the Middle East, mentions the neocons' leading role in getting the US to attack Iraq for the sake of Israel. "Zinni blames the poor planning on the civilian policymakers in the administration, known as neo-conservatives, who saw the invasion as a way to stabilize the region and support Israel. He believes these people, who include Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith, the undersecretary of defense, have hijacked U.S. foreign policy. "'They promoted it and pushed [the war]... even to the point of creating their own intelligence to match their needs. Then they should bear the responsibility.'" General Zinni has included this information in his new book "Battle Ready," which is co-written by Tom Clancy. General Zinni obviously has inside information as to how the war was set into motion. However, he probably has not studied the neocon/Israeli war agenda, in which they seek to bring about instability, not stability. See my: "The war on Iraq: Conceived in Israel" http://www.thornwalker.com/ditch/conc_toc.htm While the neocons would have liked an Iraqi puppet state, the existing instability is certainly in line with the necon/Israeli agenda to destabilize the Middle East. Zinni knows what happened from the inside. Try to listen to "60 Minutes" tonight on CBS. __________________________________________________ _________ http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/...in618896.shtml Gen. Zinni: 'They've Screwed Up' May 21, 2004 60 Minutes: Preview Ret. Gen. Anthony Zinni once commanded America's troops in the Middle East (Photo: CBS) "Regardless of whose responsibility [it is]...it should be evident to everybody that they've screwed up, and whose heads are rolling on this?" Gen. Anthony Zinni President Bush named Zinni special envoy to the Middle East. But Zinni wound up breaking ranks with the administration over the war in Iraq. (Photo: AP) FOR MORE INFORMATION: Amazon: Buy "Battle Ready" by Ret. Gen. Anthony Zinni, and co-written by Tom Clancy. (CBS) Accusing top Pentagon officials of "dereliction of duty," retired Marine Gen. Anthony Zinni says staying the course in Iraq isn't a reasonable option. "The course is headed over Niagara Falls. I think it's time to change course a little bit or at least hold somebody responsible for putting you on this course," he tells CBS News Correspondent Steve Kroft in an interview to be broadcast on 60 Minutes, Sunday, May 23, at 7 p.m. ET/PT. The current situation in Iraq was destined to happen, says Zinni, because planning for the war and its aftermath has been flawed all along. "There has been poor strategic thinking in this...poor operational planning and execution on the ground," says Zinni, who served as commander-in-chief of the U.S. Central Command from 1997 to 2000. Zinni blames the poor planning on the civilian policymakers in the administration, known as neo-conservatives, who saw the invasion as a way to stabilize the region and support Israel. He believes these people, who include Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith, the undersecretary of defense, have hijacked U.S. foreign policy. "They promoted it and pushed [the war]... even to the point of creating their own intelligence to match their needs. Then they should bear the responsibility," Zinni tells Kroft. In his upcoming book, "Battle Ready," written with Tom Clancy, Zinni writes of the poor planning in harsh terms. "In the lead-up to the Iraq war and its later conduct, I saw, at minimum, true dereliction, negligence and irresponsibility; at worst, lying, incompetence and corruption," he writes. Zinni explains to Kroft, "I think there was dereliction in insufficient forces being put on the ground and [in not] fully understanding the military dimensions of the plan." He still believes the situation is salvageable if the United States can communicate more effectively with the Iraqi people and demonstrate a better image to them. The enlistment of the U.N. and other countries to participate in the mission is also crucial, he says. Without these things, says Zinni, "We are going to be looking for quick exits. I don't believe we're there now, and I wouldn't want to see us fail here." Also central to success in Iraq is more troops, from the United States and especially other countries, to control violence and patrol borders, he says. Zinni feels that undertaking the war with the minimum of troops paved the way for the security problems the U.S. faces there now, the violence Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld recently admitted he hadn't anticipated. "He should not have been surprised," says Zinni. "There were a number of people who before we even engaged in this conflict felt strongly that we underestimated...the scope of the problems we would have in [Iraq]." The fact that no one in the administration has paid for the blunder irks Zinni. "But regardless of whose responsibility [it is]...it should be evident to everybody that they've screwed up, and whose heads are rolling on this?" Is Congress Aiding A Massive Israeli Deception?: http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=15157 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| General Zinni on Sixty Minutes | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 428 | July 2nd 04 12:16 AM |
| Showstoppers (long, but interesting questions raised) | Anonymous Spamless | Military Aviation | 0 | April 21st 04 06:09 AM |
| No US soldier should have 2 die for Israel 4 oil | Ewe n0 who | Military Aviation | 1 | April 10th 04 12:25 AM |
| No End to War | Grantland | Military Aviation | 0 | March 26th 04 05:20 AM |
| De Borchgrave: WMD, Gulf of Tonkin, and Neocons | MORRIS434 | Military Aviation | 0 | February 12th 04 09:41 PM |