![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/11/2016 4:27 PM, Andrzej Kobus wrote:
On Thursday, February 11, 2016 at 5:28:36 PM UTC-5, wrote: I'll throw two cents more into this discussion. I think xc soaring has always been a minority persuite in soaring. The vast majority of soaring pilots do not own their own ships, they are dependant upon club ships. It started this way and it is still this way. That being said, most clubs, with a few exceptions, do not place much emphasis on xc due to the hassle of retrieves etc. thus we get very little 'club' participation in contests. Those guys who own their own ships, for the most part are content to hang around doing local flying for the same reasons, the hassle factor of xc. When we eliminate the club/non owners and the 'happy to fly local/private owners from the pool, their ain't much left for contests. I think the big stumbling block to the entire situation is the lack of desire to simply fly xc. Lack of a personal machine=inability to go anywhere (for most guys). The issue comes down to DESIRE. A guy who has desire to do something will always find a way and find the cash that fulfill it. If your talking about engendering desire in a prospective contest guy, the 'buddy around a task' approach in a Duo is a helpfull way to go to prompt someone to get involved in contest flying. We need to recognize there is an intimidation factor involved in xc and we have done it to ourselves. Guys see 18 meter ships 40+/1 zipping around a 100km xc on a sunny afternoon and then they look at themselves and think 'man I'm not very good, what if I land out?' We have looked at outlandings as a sign of failure instead of accomplishment! Once we start to engender an understanding that an outlandings is no big deal, a learning experience, and possibly a sign that we took our abilities to the edge of their limits, then guys will be more enthusiastic about going for it. As for an entrance ramp for guys to get into contest flying, there are plenty as has been demonstrated in earlier posts. I have never been in a contest but I spent five years crewing for my brother in regionals and Nationals back when the Zuni and the asw20 were hot birds. I couldn't afford one of them but I did have access to a Pilates and did a whole bunch of xc flying on my own. You see I already had the DESIRE to go xc and to learn to go faster by watching and flying with those guys at the regionals. I remember one day going xc from Minden down to bishop in the Pilates and running into a bunch of guys flying the last leg of a regional task, flying with John Sinclair. It was the fasted I had ever averaged along the whites. Later that night I had a chance to talk to him and remember him telling me 'oh you were the guy in that red white n blue Pilates, yeh that leg along the whites was pretty slow' . Geese I thought we were screaming along! That one little bit of exposure to contest flying taught me more about efficient xc flying than a whole summer of punking around myself! Second factor, Let's face it, contest flying is for the most part expensive. Even to engage in sport class flying at a regional, a guy better have at least $1000 bucks in his kitty for travel gas hotel entrance fees, extra tows etc. a guy can fly a whole bunch on $1000 locally. I have returned to soaring after many years of hiatus, but since I already had the Desire to go xc, that was no problem, cost however was still an issue. I circumvented that by going back to basics. I got involved with the veritable dependable and very affordable 1-26. For under 7k a guy can find an excellent 1-26 and trailer and fly to ones hearts content. Xc IS doable, gold n diamond tasks ARE doable, and landing out IS NOT scary, humiliating or a sign of defeat. In fact it is half the fun of xc. I am prouder of my little 100km flights with a land out on a marginal day than most guys flying around in their glass n getting home. Yes I worked harder, yes I went way way slower, but I know that I made far fewer mistakes than the glass man who has the cushion of performance to cover his ass where if I make a mistake missing one thermal I am down 10 miles from home. I am redoing my badges in my 1-26. 1-26 flying is a measure of the man not the machine. As for contests in a 1-26, I talked to Wick Wilkerson the pres of the 1-26 assoc, they are waving the entrance fees for anyone who has never flown a contest before and wants to fly in the 1-26 nationals this year. Secondly, a simple logging computer like the old Oudie or nano is all that's needed to fly in their nationals. Thirdly, no matter how ratty or clean your 1-26 is, you are going to be competitive. How's that for an entrance ramp! I can't think of a better way for anyone with limited soaring experience and a limited budget to get involved in xc and in contest flying. Sincerely Dan Nezgoda 1-26 #225 Dan, this is one of the best posts in a very long time. +1! And no, that's NOT a knock on slippery glass, contests, or the skills to go XC-zooming around in any ol' 30+:1 glider. It IS a "Hear! Hear!" for not losing sight of fundamentals every single one of us "XC-able" pilots had to learn and (maybe even!) master. If I'd been given a dollar for every time I encountered someone moaning about "needing the latest glass" as the only pre-requisite they lacked in order to go XC, I might've been able to justify moving up from the 1st-generation 15-meter glider that met my needs for nearly 3 decades...no comparison-jealousy in sight! I've often wondered if those "need the latest glass" pilots were born with that belief, or if they somehow or other missed hearing, or misinterpreted what they did hear, about the things needed in order to be able to safely enjoy XC. L/D certainly wasn't near the top of the list propounded to me when I was in my "sponge-learning mode"...though it *was* discussed, along with its advantages. Truth is, I've known more of "that category" pilots who've *busted* their high L/D ships in ill-performed off-field landings than I have those who even mildly bent/busted things learning with "kiddy toy gliders." One or two even remained in the sport. Remember my period of "being a soaring grunt" began in the early 1970s, before trotting out the, "Yebbut that's because very few 21:1 machines are flown XC anymore," argument. Maybe there should be? That's how I gained my basic skills, and you can bet I was as sweaty-palmed on my first few OFLs as Joe Never-Thought-I'd-Be-Landing-My-$150,000-Glider-Off-field is when he has to do it unexpectedly "all the sudden." Judging from the known general ages of many of RAS' U.S. posters, I suspect my general background isn't a solitary experience. Let's hear it for: 1) learning the basics well; 2) gaining the basic experience without avoidable (expensive) trauma; 3) having fun soaring! The rest is just details... Bob W. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Participation | John Cochrane[_2_] | Soaring | 21 | June 17th 12 07:47 PM |
2008 SRA Poll participation | Frank[_1_] | Soaring | 2 | January 1st 09 11:37 PM |
US Club Class Participation | [email protected] | Soaring | 20 | October 30th 08 03:45 AM |
Participation in contest | Sam Giltner[_1_] | Soaring | 0 | October 4th 08 02:52 AM |
Motorglider participation in USA contests | Eric Greenwell | Soaring | 0 | October 11th 03 02:17 AM |