![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
420 knots in the A-10...depends on whether or not we're talking indicated
airspeed or true. 420 indicated is a "book" speed...few Hog pilots ever see that in the cockpit. With a decent load, a typical max speed in a cool, sea level climate would be about 350KIAS. Any hard maneuvering would bleed that down pretty fast. Increase the temperature, and the jet's performance drops off alarmingly...at Red Flag, we could get maybe 300KIAS on the deck after a long run in. A 90 degree hard turn would bleed that down to about 250KIAS which was our "knock it off" point. The A-10 is quite maneuverable for its apparent size. WW2 fighter roll rates were relatively slow compared to modern jets...and roll rate is a very important aspect of turn performance. If the A-10 is clean, it can maneuver very well in cool temperatures and low altitudes. It is not a high altitude machine, and would not be a good comparison to a late WW2 fighter in that sense. The A-10 gun is a true laser beam in close in air combat...and today's Hog has a much better gunsight than was in the early 1980s airplane. In Europe back in the good old days, there was many a F-16 and F-15 pilot that lived to rue the day that he got low and slow with the Hog. But, after all is said and done, in these comparisons, we always have to return to the only thing that is important. The pilot. Past that, most everything else is conjecture. "Stephen Harding" wrote in message ... We've had a couple scenarios of aircraft going back in time and speculation on what sort of effect they'd have. I just saw a show on the A-10 Warthog with a top speed of 420 mph. That's WWII fighter speeds (although I'm not certain at what altitude). Since an A-10 can carry something like 16,000 pounds of weapons, at the speeds it flies, it would be one hell of a WWII bomber. I'll bet even Art would ditch Willie in a second to fly such a machine. But what about as a fighter? Other than the extreme ruggedness of the aircraft, would it have been any good in fighter contests, especially in Europe, but in the Pacific as well? Seems the 30mm canon is a bit over kill for fighters. Probably just load it up with a bunch of 20mm canons in wings and as would fit in the nose. It wouldn't be much good taking over mustang escort duty since its range is only about 800 miles. The aircraft seems very maneuverable, but I have no clue how its roll rate, climb, dive and turn/stall performance compare with a late WWII fighter of German or Japanese pedigree. Could an A-10 hold its own, or best, an Me 109 or FW 190? An Oscar, Zero, Tony, Frank, whatever? No doubt the marines in the Pacific would love the A-10 and the harrassed German ground transport would really take a thrashing if this aircraft showed up. But would the fighter opposition be quaking in their flight boots? SMH |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WWII Aircraft still useful | Charles Talleyrand | Military Aviation | 14 | January 12th 04 01:40 AM |
FA: WWII B-3jacket, B-1 pants, Class A uniform | N329DF | Military Aviation | 1 | August 16th 03 03:41 PM |
Vitre d'avion de la WWII ? WWII planes panes ? | Dessocea | Military Aviation | 0 | August 15th 03 07:07 PM |
"Target for Today" & "Thunderbolt" WWII Double Feature at Zeno'sDrive-In | Zeno | Aerobatics | 0 | August 2nd 03 07:31 PM |
"Target for Today" & "Thunderbolt": An Awesome WWII DoubleFeature at Zeno's Drive-In | zeno | Military Aviation | 0 | July 14th 03 07:31 PM |