![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"John Carrier" writes: Just out of curiosity, what is the source for all your PsubS data? In the case of the numbers I posted, the inital data comes from teh Standard Aircraft Characteristics for the particular aircraft. Using the characteristcs of teh engine, I generate the thrust curve for that altitude & speed range, which gives me the total for Drag. (For the engine, I can dope it out with Sea Level Static Thrust & SFC data, the bypass ratio, and overall pressure ratio.) Then come the fun part, breaking the drag numbers down to the individual contributions, and fit them into a predicticed curve for total drag coefficient. Then I test vs. certain point conditions - Vmax at Sea Level, and various altitudes for Vmax values, and PsubSmax at Sea Level, (Rate of Climb), and the altitude at which PsubSmax = 100 ft/minute (Service ceiling). If the numbers are within reason, then it gets plugged into teh flight model section of the Mighty Wurlitzer to deliver a PsubS matrix for all acheivable speeds and altitudes. (Much repetitive work, let teh computer do it!) While that's crunching away, I'm running mathematicl models of teh airplane geomety through LDstab and VLM to get the stability derivitives and the control moments. So far, I've got things tuned to deliver numbers with a nominal 3% accuracy to the flight test data, which is less than the variation that you'll find in a squadron-sized group of airplanes. A-4F always clean. TA-4J on occasion clean. Thanks, John. I don't have any good Skyhawk numbers yet, but it seems that on a little jet like that, the tanks would make a big difference, wrt drag. -- Pete Stickney A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many bad measures. -- Daniel Webster |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
GPS Altitude with WAAS | Phil Verghese | Instrument Flight Rules | 42 | October 5th 03 12:39 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
#1 Jet of World War II | Christopher | Military Aviation | 203 | September 1st 03 03:04 AM |
Aircraft engine certification FAR's | Corky Scott | Home Built | 4 | July 25th 03 06:46 PM |