![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Fuzzy Footie" wrote in message ... John Hart wrote: "Fuzzy Footie" wrote in message ... Kevin Brooks wrote: "Fuzzy Footie" wrote in message ... BamaJohn wrote: Anyone have any information on how they feel Fort Rucker will fare in the next round of Base Realignment and Closure. What are its strenths and what are in weaknesses, and what are its major threats? Any information is appreciated. Fort Rucker will probably survive this round due to politics. (Yes, I know the BRAC is supposed to be non-political.) If the location of the Army Flight Training Center were to be made on a strictly military needs basis, the Aviation Center would be moved to Fort Irwin. Between the NTC and Edwards AFB, there are about 950,000 acres of desert and mountains for maneuver. Is putting new trainee pilots into a high/hot situation from the outset really advisable? Not to mention the folks running the NTC would probably just as soon not have to worry about all of those TH-67's whirling around while they are trying to do serious work like running a BLUEFOR BCT through the wringer... Brooks -- Fuzz Hey! Evolution in action. While Fort Irwin is probably not the best climate or altitude to learn, for the foreseeable future that's the climate they will be flying in. There is enough acreage that they could keep to propeller heads away from the maneuver forces. Of course, Forts Campbell, Bragg or Benning have much more 'back' post area for flight training without flying trainees over civilian neighborhoods. -- Fuzz I see you've never been trained as a pilot. Hell, Texas ain't big enough to train pilots in! Been there and done that, got the T-shirt, and wore it out completely! Glad to hear it, but what's that got to do with the small on post flight area for first phase trainees at Fort Rucker? The post has worked for years in trying to gain more restricted air space for training. -- Fuzz That's the point. It ain't all done in a small area in the first phase. I went through rotary wing primary training in Ft Woters, TX myself, then after my first tour in 'Nam, I worked there three years as a primary flight instructor. To handle 200 or 300 primary students, a helicopter primary school uses up a hell of a lot more airspace than is available at any post with an active arty impact area. Got to keep'em clear of the GT line, out of the impact area, and completely away from such things as parachute drops, not to mention out of commercial air traffic, and seperated from each other. Might be able to do all that if you draw a 250 - 300 mile radius around a given place, and can control ALL the airspace from the surface upward. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|