![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, October 20, 2016 at 3:12:01 PM UTC+2, Eric Greenwell wrote:
Per Carlin wrote on 10/18/2016 11:15 PM: On Wednesday, October 19, 2016 at 12:46:41 AM UTC+2, Kevin Christner wrote: Does anyone else think this would be an unbelievable combination? Why spoil Dianas performace advantage with and FES? Performance advantage over what? There are many higher performance gliders than the Diana! ;^) The Diana2 is solely built for high performance in competitions and they succeeded, for a period was it dominating the 15m class and still should if there were more of them in flying condition. If you build a best in class glider for competition, why destroy the advantage by putting a drag inducing propeller in the nose? If you need a FES, go for a LAK 17, LAK19 of Discus2 or one of all those new UL. If you need best performance in the 15m class go for a Diana2, but don’t combine them. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
F/S szd-56 Diana | zxcvb | Soaring | 0 | October 8th 10 08:39 AM |
SZD-56 Diana | Wayne Paul | Aviation Photos | 0 | March 11th 08 01:19 PM |
Diana-2 VH-VHZ | BlueCumulus[_2_] | Soaring | 3 | July 25th 07 08:00 AM |
Odp: SZD 56-2 DIANA | Yurek | Soaring | 4 | January 31st 05 08:46 PM |
SZD-56-2 Diana | Yurek | Soaring | 1 | January 29th 05 01:02 PM |