A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Did we win in Viet Nam?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #32  
Old June 18th 04, 04:41 PM
Dave Holford
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Howard Berkowitz wrote:

In article , Dave Holford
wrote:



Maybe I mis-remember, but I thought that our objective was to insure
the ongoing
vitality of an anti-communist government in the southern part of Viet
Nam which
would, by its existence, prevent the spread of the communist form of
government
elsewhere in SEA.

George Z.



Interesting, sounds like a political statement, but I don't remember
seeing it anywhere before - could you provide a name, or document where
that statement originated as a U.S. objective - I would be interested in
some background on its creation.


Probably the most succinct statement is a memo from Assistant Secretary
of Defense John McNaughton to SecDef McNamara. Key excerpt:


3/24/65 (first draft)

ANNEX-PLAN OF ACTION FOR SOUTH VIETNAM

1. US aims:


70% --To avoid a humiliating US defeat (to our reputation as a
guarantor).
20%--To keep SVN (and then adjacent) territory from Chinese hands.
10%--To permit the people of SVN to enjoy a better, freer way of life.

ALSO--To emerge from crisis without unacceptable taint from methods used.
NOT--To "help a friend," although it would be hard to stay in if asked
out.


For the full memo and context (from the Pentagon Papers), see
http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel...on3/doc253.htm



Wow, that has to be the longest "succinct" statement in the history of
the English language.

Do you have the actual memo, rather than the (first draft)?

Dave
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What F-102 units were called up for Viet Nam Tarver Engineering Military Aviation 101 March 5th 06 04:13 AM
Two MOH Winners say Bush Didn't Serve WalterM140 Military Aviation 196 June 15th 04 12:33 AM
GWB and the Air Guard JD Military Aviation 77 March 17th 04 11:52 AM
Simpy One of Many Stories of a Time Not So Long Ago Badwater Bill Home Built 40 March 16th 04 07:35 PM
B-57 in Viet Nam Chris Spierings Military Aviation 13 October 13th 03 01:24 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.