![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "hobo" wrote in message ... In article , John Cook wrote: With JSF, the US forces will have a block approach: * Block 1: basic capability with JDAM and AIM-120 * Block 2: more refined mission software, more weapons certified * Block 3: 100 per cent of mission software, all the hardware certified I can understand not wanting to sell TURKEY or even Israel top of the line equipment, but if we can't trust Oz and the UK then we should just say screw it and go home. It is not so much a matter of not trusting/allowing them access to technology as it is a matter of it being a spiral development effort. The first US aircraft will be Block 1, followed by Block 2, then ultimately Block 3; spiral development gets the aircraft into service earlier, albeit without it having its ultimate capabilities realized. As more capabilities are realized, they are incorporated into the production blocks. If it were a *trust* issue, why is the *US military* also going to have Block 1 and 2 aircraft serving in our own forces? Brooks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|