![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I recently visited the Udvar-Hazy facility and received the usual
story about how the Corsair got its inverted gull wings, i.e. to accomodate the 13 ft. prop which, in turn, was necesitated by the engines power. However, the Hellcat used essentially the same engine, and IIRC also used a 13 ft. prop. Yet it did not need those wings. In fact it was mid winged, not low winged. So what is the true story? Were the gull wings just one solution. How did the Hellcat accomodate the prop? Longer landing gear? Or am I wrong? Was the Hellcat prop 13 ft.? -- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
All I Wanted For Christmas Were Inverted Spins | [email protected] | Aerobatics | 3 | December 29th 04 07:40 PM |
VP-II wings available in Oregon, USA (Or, "How I was coconuted...") | Roberto Waltman | Home Built | 2 | October 29th 04 04:21 PM |
inverted spin recovery explanation | Alan Wood | Aerobatics | 18 | August 19th 04 03:32 PM |
Double covering fabric covered wings | [email protected] | Home Built | 9 | May 9th 04 08:39 PM |
Crooked or Wavy Trailing Edges of Wings and Control Surfaces | Larry Smith | Home Built | 3 | October 24th 03 02:31 AM |