![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Monday, May 29, 2017 at 11:28:43 AM UTC-4, Matt Herron Jr. wrote:
On Monday, May 29, 2017 at 6:20:59 AM UTC-7, wrote: Just curious if current technology could easily/cheaply support this calculation ... using a couple of accelerometers ... kk are you concerned with dumping water and changing your CG? Hi Matt ... not really, the factory numbers and methods we all use are sound and time tested ... and I just used these methods to calculate CGs for an empty ship - and with pilot and chute - just to know 'exactly' where the CG is located. I was just curious if CG could be calculated in flight ... using hardware/electronics that are available today. Just a question on a rainy afternoon in Delaware. kk |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 302 wind calculation | 5Z | Soaring | 1 | March 26th 10 12:56 PM |
| 302 wind calculation | AK | Soaring | 0 | March 26th 10 03:47 AM |
| flight computer calculation | Tim | General Aviation | 1 | April 26th 05 11:40 AM |
| Three leg GS to TAS calculation | Mike Rapoport | Owning | 21 | September 12th 04 05:37 AM |
| The "Complex" TAS calculation | Arnold Pieper | Soaring | 2 | December 14th 03 01:22 PM |