![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , tw
writes I've always wondered, what are the differences between the M1, the M1 Garand and the M14? M1 rifle was named the Garand: chambered for .30-06 and feeding from an eight-shot charger. M14 was very similar, but was chambered in 7.62mm NATO, used a twenty-round box magazine, and in some versions had a full-auto capability (little used and often deleted) Is it just cosmetic stuff like magazine capacity, barrel length and shape of the stock etc, or is there a big difference in the action? /*obligatory nationalist point scoring to be taken with pinch of salt*/ Of course, the SLR kicked both their arses, and the Lee-Enfield was better still! ;-) Now, for lethality you want a Martini-Henry ![]() -- He thinks too much: such men are dangerous. Julius Caesar I:2 Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
F-102 pilot kicks sailors ass | D. Strang | Military Aviation | 22 | March 26th 04 05:03 AM |