![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
IBM wrote:
* US * wrote in : [snip] The casualties in Iraq are already worse than those from the comparable period in Vietnam. U r wun dum phuq. Lets see 1000 in just over a year. At that rate it will take at least 5 decades to match Vietnam. The bushkultie isn't happy if too few US soldiers are killed ... Nah, you seem to be confused. Its the Dhimmicreeps who want blood thigh deep in the streets. IBM __________________________________________________ _____________________________ Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com The Worlds Uncensored News Source What were the casualties in the first year of the Vietnam war, dumb right wing asshole? And why isn't a gung ho Noble Republican warmonger in Iraq pulling some guard duty, instead of sucking right wing dicks on the internet? -- "Our enemies are innovative and resourceful. And so are we.. Our enemies never stop thinking about ways to harm our country and our people. And neither do we.." -George W. Bush, August 5, 2002 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|