![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Emmanuel Gustin" wrote in message om... "Leadfoot" wrote in message news:KYBVc.118201$sh.114795@fed1read06... What are some of the greatest strategic air missions? Depends on what you criterion for "greatest" is. The attacks on the Paul Doumer bridge, the Tirpitz, and the Japanese carriers at Midway can't really be described as strategic; I would also rule out the assasination of Yamamoto from that category. The lgb attack on Paul Doumer knocked it out for a considerable time. This was a vital artery for munitions from China. Tirpitz tied down a considerable number of capitol ships Without aircraft carriers the Japanese decided not to take Midway A great deal of thought went into Yamamoto. One, was it legal to target a particual individual in war? Two, did Japan have anyone better? Three, was he worth risking the breaking of JN-25 cypher being revealed? Let me ask the question another way. How many of you can name his replacement off the top of your head? Scroll down for the answer Admiral Mineichi Koga, who took over as Commander-in-Chief of the Imperial Navy after Yamamoto's assassination said it very simply: There was only one Yamamoto, and no one can replace him. If impact on the course of the war (regardless of risk, losses, or size of the operation) makes an operation "great", then Hiroshima and Nagasaki must take first place. Followed, perhaps, by the Doolittle raid, which had an impact on Japanese strategy entirely out of proportion with the damage done or the size of the force involved. But these were of course very much exceptional missions, hard to compare with anything else. If the criterion for a "great" operation is large, bloody battle with lots of opportunity to demonstrate personal valour, then it is hard to overlook the attacks on Regensburg, Schweinfurt and Ploesti. These cannot be called really successful, I thought of them and decided not to list them for that very reason and their impact on the course of the war was not what had been hoped, but they were certainly events in which a lot of courage was displayed and a lot of people died, and deserve to be remembered. On a smaller scale, 617's attack on the dams also belongs in this category, if you consider the survival rate on this operation. On the whole the problem with "great strategic missions" is that as a rule, single missions had little value. Factories, power plants, railway installations, etc. would be repaired after an attack, and often surprisingly quickly. To keep them disabled repeat attacks were always necessary. But then you are talking about a strategic campaign, not a mission. The campaign against the German transport network was probably the most significant and successful of all, followed by the campaign against the German oil industry. Operation "Point Blank" the destruction of the Luftwaffe was pretty good too. I considered listing it. maybe if we see "greatest strategic air campaigns" Emmanuel Gustin |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Russian recon planes fly ten missions over Baltics | B2431 | Military Aviation | 4 | March 2nd 04 05:44 AM |
| New Story on my Website | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 42 | February 18th 04 06:01 AM |
| OT (sorta): Bush Will Announce New Space Missions | Dav1936531 | Military Aviation | 0 | January 9th 04 11:34 AM |
| French block airlift of British troops to Basra | Michael Petukhov | Military Aviation | 202 | October 24th 03 07:48 PM |
| Strategic Command Missions Rely on Space | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 30th 03 10:59 PM |