![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bill Kambic" wrote in message ... "Blair Maynard" wrote in message My question is why not configure the rear engines as pusher engines? Did the German Arrow aircraft not show that this was an effective combination? The total number of "pusher" designs that went past the drawing board can be counted on about one hand. The FACT that nobody ever produced them in numbers during the Golden Age of Prop Aircraft (a/k/a WWII) should tell us a lot about their feasibility. There are a few more than that In no particular order the Vickers FB5, DeHavilland DH-2 , Convair B-36 , Beechcraft Model 2400, Nomad II & III and Supermarine Walrus come to mind There are problems with airflow stability for a pusher design but I suspect the biggest problem was pilot survivability, especially in single engine designs. Bailing out with a prop behind you is hardly a nice idea, as I recall they tried various fixes on the DO-335 including explosively blowing off the prop and fitting ejector seats. Keith |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|